![](https://i.imgur.com/CLvY2jA.png")
20-07-2023, 07:32 PM
Looking at the "resignation letter", it is obvious it looked forced and bopain for CLH, since if she does not "resign", she will be sacked by LHL also
So, it is not well carried out by PAP
In our modern society, there is nothing legally or tribally wrong for an unmarried woman to fall in love and she is free to love anyone
It so happened she loved an unmarried man, but this is very common in our modern society and we are only cautionary if the woman is a minor
CLH is not a minor and she she knows what both of them are doing
And love is blind
Only TCJ, as a married person and Speaker of Parliament, could have done something morally incorrect, but not legally wrong
It's just a perception, but since PAP does not like adultery, it has the right to "sack" TCJ but why "sack" CLH? What wrong has she done?
So, it is not well carried out by PAP
In our modern society, there is nothing legally or tribally wrong for an unmarried woman to fall in love and she is free to love anyone
It so happened she loved an unmarried man, but this is very common in our modern society and we are only cautionary if the woman is a minor
CLH is not a minor and she she knows what both of them are doing
And love is blind
Only TCJ, as a married person and Speaker of Parliament, could have done something morally incorrect, but not legally wrong
It's just a perception, but since PAP does not like adultery, it has the right to "sack" TCJ but why "sack" CLH? What wrong has she done?
