[Everything Everywhere]

Singapore's approach to international conflicts, such as the Israel-Iran tensions, is generally guided by a few consistent principles:

1. Neutral and Pragmatic Foreign Policy

Singapore maintains a non-aligned and pragmatic foreign policy, avoiding taking sides in highly polarizing international disputes unless its national interests or international law are clearly at stake. It often refrains from making direct condemnations unless:

There is a clear violation of international law.

Singapore's own interests or regional stability are threatened.


2. Emphasis on Sovereignty and Rule of Law

While Singapore supports the rules-based international order, it tends to express concern in general terms, without targeting specific nations unless the facts are uncontested and severe. In the case of Israel’s strike on Iran, if the situation is seen as part of ongoing tit-for-tat military actions, Singapore may view it as complex and not entirely “unprovoked.”

3. Strategic Interests and Relationships

Singapore has strong diplomatic and security ties with both the U.S. and Israel, including defense technology cooperation and trade. Openly condemning Israel could risk straining these relationships, which are strategically important to Singapore’s survival as a small state in a volatile region.

4. Cautious Approach to Middle East Conflicts

Singapore typically avoids getting deeply involved in Middle Eastern politics due to:

The complexity and volatility of the region.

Its multicultural domestic population, including Muslim citizens, where taking a strong stance on Israel/Iran could have internal social implications.


5. Waiting for Clear International Consensus

Singapore often waits for UN resolutions or international consensus before making strong statements. In the absence of clear international condemnation, it may choose to issue a general call for restraint instead.

[Geneco]

need some advice why Singapore didn't condemn usual suspects and shills for their UNPROVOKED attack on the SAFE and EFFECTIVE mRNA jabs narrative by being SCARED and HUMJI to update their latest mRNA jabs lolololololololoolol...

[grotesqueness]

Israel is for defense purposes

So
ATTACK
ATTACK
ATTACK

[Gstalk]

Israel going to flatten Iran very soon.

Buy your own popcorn

[Blasterlord2]

Because we bought a lot of weapons from them.

[ysh02]

We also ask them help to train our army before ....

[grotesqueness]

Israel going to flatten Iran very soon.

Buy your own popcorn

Of course lah

uSA supply nuclear weapons

[Alice Alicia]

PAP is waiting for wind direction.

[Clyde]

See if today they will condemn Iran for the attack.

[cheekopekman]

Singapore's approach to international conflicts, such as the Israel-Iran tensions, is generally guided by a few consistent principles:

1. Neutral and Pragmatic Foreign Policy

Singapore maintains a non-aligned and pragmatic foreign policy, avoiding taking sides in highly polarizing international disputes unless its national interests or international law are clearly at stake. It often refrains from making direct condemnations unless:

There is a clear violation of international law.

Singapore's own interests or regional stability are threatened.


2. Emphasis on Sovereignty and Rule of Law

While Singapore supports the rules-based international order, it tends to express concern in general terms, without targeting specific nations unless the facts are uncontested and severe. In the case of Israel’s strike on Iran, if the situation is seen as part of ongoing tit-for-tat military actions, Singapore may view it as complex and not entirely “unprovoked.”

3. Strategic Interests and Relationships

Singapore has strong diplomatic and security ties with both the U.S. and Israel, including defense technology cooperation and trade. Openly condemning Israel could risk straining these relationships, which are strategically important to Singapore’s survival as a small state in a volatile region.

4. Cautious Approach to Middle East Conflicts

Singapore typically avoids getting deeply involved in Middle Eastern politics due to:

The complexity and volatility of the region.

Its multicultural domestic population, including Muslim citizens, where taking a strong stance on Israel/Iran could have internal social implications.


5. Waiting for Clear International Consensus

Singapore often waits for UN resolutions or international consensus before making strong statements. In the absence of clear international condemnation, it may choose to issue a general call for restraint instead.

Why must Singapore kaypoh other countries problems leh?

[Migrant]

Why must Singapore kaypoh other countries problems leh?

Right . Don't kaypoh.
Open mouth?
Becareful flies everywhere.
They come from as far as Taiwan.
Always on attacking mode

[cheekopekman]

Right . Don't kaypoh.
Open mouth?
Becareful flies everywhere.
They come from as far as Taiwan.
Always on attacking mode

Flies, mosquitoes, bees, ants, etc... they are everywhere lah!

[Clyde]

It is not like they have not take sides before.

[sclim]

singapore should more convern by learning from these missiles, drones exchange.

we need to build a stronger air defence system.

like investing to examine how to build a shield so that even if a missile hit the damage is limited.

for example using an air fill body . the surface is covered with strong material like carbon fibre.
multi layer so that when a missile hit, the energy is absorb by the air compression inside the air filled body.
the carbon layer prevent punture from the missiles.

also has these airfilled layer to cover aircraft, tanks, missile defence base so that smaller cheap drone attack is reflect off.

low cost bullets like magnetic gun so that it can spray at drones. cheap versus cheap then can continue.

most at all if f35 is available for sale. buy it.

[Napoleon Porlumpar]

Singapore's approach to international conflicts, such as the Israel-Iran tensions, is generally guided by a few consistent principles:

1. Neutral and Pragmatic Foreign Policy

Singapore maintains a non-aligned and pragmatic foreign policy, avoiding taking sides in highly polarizing international disputes unless its national interests or international law are clearly at stake. It often refrains from making direct condemnations unless:

There is a clear violation of international law.

Singapore's own interests or regional stability are threatened.


2. Emphasis on Sovereignty and Rule of Law

While Singapore supports the rules-based international order, it tends to express concern in general terms, without targeting specific nations unless the facts are uncontested and severe. In the case of Israel’s strike on Iran, if the situation is seen as part of ongoing tit-for-tat military actions, Singapore may view it as complex and not entirely “unprovoked.”

3. Strategic Interests and Relationships

Singapore has strong diplomatic and security ties with both the U.S. and Israel, including defense technology cooperation and trade. Openly condemning Israel could risk straining these relationships, which are strategically important to Singapore’s survival as a small state in a volatile region.

4. Cautious Approach to Middle East Conflicts

Singapore typically avoids getting deeply involved in Middle Eastern politics due to:

The complexity and volatility of the region.

Its multicultural domestic population, including Muslim citizens, where taking a strong stance on Israel/Iran could have internal social implications.


5. Waiting for Clear International Consensus

Singapore often waits for UN resolutions or international consensus before making strong statements. In the absence of clear international condemnation, it may choose to issue a general call for restraint instead.

the Rothschilds created Israel........................

the Rothschild-owned British East India Company sent Raffles to S'pore..............

S'pore is still a Rothschild-controlled colony..............

[forum456]

Why Singapore refuse to condemn Israel for unprovoked attack on Iran

because WP MPs are sleeping and PAP MPs will keep quiet.

WP MPs should ask why PAP refuses to condemn Israel for unprovoked attack on Iran.

[forum456]

if Singapore refuses to condemn Israel for attacking Iran, it means Singapore cannot condemn Russia for attacking Ukraine because Singapore will become a hypocrite

[cheekopekman]

if Singapore refuses to condemn Israel for attacking Iran, it means Singapore cannot condemn Russia for attacking Ukraine because Singapore will become a hypocrite

Singapore supports Israel and Russia lah!

[Alice Alicia]

https://ibb.co/8nCd2FWj

[cheekopekman]

https://ibb.co/8nCd2FWj

東亞病夫啦！haha  有種就動手啦！haha