[Bigiron]

Questions to viewer on Chan Chun sing interview

https://youtu.be/87gHvkSo6Y0?si=s8S8y53Q99xdV1I1

1. On the "Political Non-Answer": The Minister was very careful to say the decision on female conscription is not being made "now". What is the difference between him saying "not now" and simply saying "no," and what does that specific word choice tell you about the government's future options?

2. On Creating Anxiety without Agency: After he powerfully connects global conflicts directly to your personal finances—your job, your wages, your prices—how does it make you feel? Empowered with a role to play, or simply more anxious about powerful forces completely beyond your control?

3. On Abstraction vs. Reality: When you hear the Minister use technical terms like "strategic lines of communication," does that make the threat feel more urgent and personal, or does it create a sense that these are complex problems for the government to solve, separate from your daily life?

4. On the "Invisible Success": The Minister asks for trust based on the fact that the SAF's greatest successes are invisible—threats you never hear about. As a citizen, how does it feel to be asked to support a multi-billion dollar operation based on dangers you are told exist but cannot see?

5. On the "Calm Fortress": The Minister describes Singapore as an "oasis of calm," yet at the same time, a nation facing thousands of threats daily. How can both of these things be true? What does this paradox reveal about the immense, unspoken cost of maintaining our sense of peace?

6. On Shrinking Force vs. Growing Threats: When the Minister lays out two conflicting facts—a shrinking pool of soldiers and growing security threats—what is the unspoken but urgent message he is sending about the future of Singapore's defence and the role that technology and volunteers must play?

7. On Total Defence vs. Selective Roles: The Minister enthusiastically encourages women to volunteer, aligning with the "Total Defence" spirit. Why, then, does he become so guarded and evasive when asked about the most direct application of that principle—National Service? What does this inconsistency reveal about the line between strategic necessity and societal readiness?

[Bigiron]

Clustering (Multiple gestures in succession)

00:50 - 00:55: A cluster appears as he makes his main point. He begins with a lip compression, uses illustrative hand gestures, and then follows with a lip purse as he says, "...but neither are we at peace." This combination suggests a carefully considered, serious, and nuanced statement.

3:06 - 3:09: While discussing the economic impact, he displays a slight shoulder shrug, a lip purse, and a head tilt. This cluster conveys the weight and complexity of the consequences he is describing.

3:25 - 3:28: He ends the point about the economy with another strong cluster: a definitive chopping hand gesture, a very firm lip compression, and intense focus. This cluster serves to strongly emphasize the direct impact of global instability on citizens' daily lives.

Shoulder Shrugs (Indicating uncertainty or "it is what it is")

1:06: A very slight, almost imperceptible one-sided shoulder lift when saying "on a daily basis," possibly to indicate the routine nature of these high-stakes challenges.

1:35: A clear, two-shouldered shrug when mentioning the need to "ascertain their intent," underscoring the inherent uncertainty and difficulty of the task.

4:48: A distinct shrug when he refers to modern warfare tactics seen "in the recent conflicts," framing it as an observable fact rather than just his opinion.

Lip Compression (Holding back, stress, or emphasis)

00:51: A brief but firm compression of the lips at the start of his statement, "So today we are not at war," setting a serious tone.

1:27: He presses his lips together firmly right after stating that the number of air threats "goes into the hundreds," emphasizing the large number.

3:27: A very strong, sustained lip compression after listing the direct impacts: "jobs, wages, and prices." This is a powerful non-verbal signal used to punctuate his most critical point for the public.

5:16: He firmly compresses his lips while stating, "I don't think we are making that decision now," signaling a definitive and non-negotiable position on the topic of conscription for women.

Lip Purses (Disagreement, concentration, or withholding thought)

00:54: Purses his lips as he delivers the line, "but neither are we at peace," indicating the point is contrary to what one might assume.

4:11: A clear lip purse as he discusses looking at "other low-cost options," suggesting careful thought and evaluation.

Tongue Jutting (Concentration or being caught in a thought)

1:31: A quick, subtle tongue jut as he transitions to talking about the navy, indicating a moment of concentration.

4:56: A clear tongue jut as he explains that smaller military units can be more powerful. This often happens when a person is focused on a specific detail they are explaining.

Self-Soothing (Managing stress or cognitive load)

1:00 - 1:02: As he discusses the SAF dealing with daily threats, his hands are clasped and he gently rubs his thumbs together. This is a common, low-level gesture to manage stress.

2:12 - 2:13: The same hand-rubbing gesture appears as he talks about the 24/7 operation to ke
ep national systems "safe and secure."