Posts: 21,941
   
Threads: 6,199
    
Likes Received: 4,091 in 3,203 posts
Likes Given: 471
(04-06-2023, 01:17 PM)FartSunKing Wrote: Chan Chun Sing also born poor like you
I also born poor, a family of 7 living in a one bedroom company house
But I never gave up despite all my setbacks in my life
I got expelled from school after O levels
Flung my final year exams in NTU
My 1st wife left me
You flung your A levels, become a quitter and a whinner
Blaming PAP for your own mistakes and failures in your life
Wake up your fcuking ideas you fcuking moron!
There is flawed of isolated examples...because one person can run 5 minute mile does not mean everyone or most can.
Chan is not doubt top of 30,000 students to get president and saf scholarship...and set for life.He is not representative of ordinary people.
A good system cannot narrowly benefit a small number of elites and 3xpect broad-based support.
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
Posts: 27,450
   
Threads: 8,749
    
Likes Received: 5,514 in 4,973 posts
Likes Given: 9
(04-06-2023, 11:11 AM)forum456 Wrote: Raj made a good point but he and PAP are 20 years behind time.
20 years ago, PAP said lack of local IT talents and kept importing CECA until today.
recently PAP started a govt job attachment program to train locals for IT jobs in finance.
there were 4000 local applicants for 700 vacancies.
another govt IT job attachment program has 800 local applicants for 22 vacancies.
clearly, there is no lack of local talents but lack of training for local talents.
there is no need to import CECA unless there is no local applicant for the govt IT training.
it is useless to tell PAP to change when it has been happening for past 20 years.
Is MOE mess up. Look at the Minister in charge now back to a Ex SAF Scholar in charge.
In fact teacher union used to oppose it feel Ex SAF not suitable in charge education that is many years back when Teo C H in charge.
And look what PAP do now? put Ex SAF scholar back in charge Education after routing around.
Remember early 2000 Polytechnic aggressive promote IT courses? now 2023 , literally already 23 years! Yet in the end claim no enough IT talents???
Something obviously again went wrong in MOE.
Posts: 2,229
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 757 in 595 posts
Likes Given: 516
(04-06-2023, 11:40 AM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: Nonsense. It's not true that parents have to spend money to send their children overseas for degree course. There're already many universities here in Spore.
If you cannot get into any of those then you shouldn't expect the universities to lower their standards for you.
Yes, there are many universities in Singapore and there are many vacancies in certain courses too. But if your child has no interest in taking up those unpopular courses, the parents have no choice but to spend money to send him/her overseas.
Also, our 2 universities produce insufficient doctors to go round. Our government has to import so many doctors whose degrees are from those dubious universities. As a Singaporean, what would you prefer, nurture your own doctors or bring in from third world countries?
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2023, 01:32 PM by
Clyde.)
Posts: 11,350
   
Threads: 774
    
Likes Received: 3,576 in 2,933 posts
Likes Given: 475
(04-06-2023, 12:58 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: Based on what you say the govt can just under provision university for Singaporeans then blame them for not reaching standards.
Its see of they provide sufficient university places we just need to compare with other developed countries
If you compare the number of places given to Singaporeans to that i nthe past, you'll find that this number has increased tremendously. But has the quality of degree holders improved? The answer is no. I've seen plenty of local degree holders who cannot make it. These people would not even have gotten into university in the past had the government not open up more places for them. And yet, these exact same people now demand that they should be paid a lot more because they have a degree, despite having worse performance than diploma holders.
In reality, the intelligence of a population cannot be trained. It all boils down to statistics. The number of clever people in a country is just limited to that few number. Even if the rest can get a degree they're just not as capable. No amount of training can transform them into thinkers.
Posts: 11,350
   
Threads: 774
    
Likes Received: 3,576 in 2,933 posts
Likes Given: 475
(04-06-2023, 01:29 PM)Clyde Wrote: Yes, there are many universities in Singapore and there are many vacancies in certain courses too. But if your child has no interest in taking up those unpopular courses, the parents have no choice but to spend money to send him/her overseas.
Also, our 2 universities produce insufficient doctors to go round. Our government has to import so many doctors whose degrees are from those dubious universities. As a Singaporean, what would you prefer, nurture your own doctors or bring in from third world countries?
Let's be honest about it. Most folks here dun choose a course because they love it, but because they know that they'll have better prospects with it. No matter how many places you open up for medicine, they'll never be enough, so long as people think that they can make a lot of money in that career. The only way to dampen this is to make sure that doctors earn a good but not obscene amount. This is something that the govt has failed to do.
I advocate for a narrower gap between salaries of different professions, not for the opening up of more places for locals in university.
Posts: 1,544
   
Threads: 62
    
Likes Received: 790 in 569 posts
Likes Given: 1,903
(04-06-2023, 01:25 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: Is MOE mess up. Look at the Minister in charge now back to a Ex SAF Scholar in charge.
In fact teacher union used to oppose it feel Ex SAF not suitable in charge education that is many years back when Teo C H in charge.
And look what PAP do now? put Ex SAF scholar back in charge Education after routing around.
Remember early 2000 Polytechnic aggressive promote IT courses? now 2023 , literally already 23 years! Yet in the end claim no enough IT talents???
Something obviously again went wrong in MOE.
The promotion of IT to young Sinkies began in the mid 1990s. Yet Singapore has utterly failed to develop a thriving IT ecosystem.
The reason being that the Pappies failed to realize that nurturing and developing an entire industry needs captains who have to constantly lead and drive the growth of the industry by developing a local talent pool and evetually LEADERs in that field. This means revamping education policies, having concrete academic paths and co-developing programs with technology corporations. Yet the lazy Pappy fuggers did the most idiotic thing which is opening the floodgates and allowing CECAs etc to swamp the sector and give bullcrap excuses that this sort of move will result in skills transfer LMFAO!
One generation later and zero progress has been made.
Posts: 2,229
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 757 in 595 posts
Likes Given: 516
(04-06-2023, 02:20 PM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: Let's be honest about it. Most folks here dun choose a course because they love it, but because they know that they'll have better prospects with it. No matter how many places you open up for medicine, they'll never be enough, so long as people think that they can make a lot of money in that career. The only way to dampen this is to make sure that doctors earn a good but not obscene amount. This is something that the govt has failed to do.
I advocate for a narrower gap between salaries of different professions, not for the opening up of more places for locals in university.
Both my children are not interested in medical even though they have good results. One of them told me he did not want to do anything with the sick or death.
Note also that for engineering course, they have already lowered the standard/entry requirement until cannot lower any further. Last time was straight 'A', and now between 'B 'and 'C'. Now the number of foreign students is more than the local students. During the 80s, almost all are local students and few Malaysians.
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2023, 03:04 PM by
Clyde.)
Posts: 21,941
   
Threads: 6,199
    
Likes Received: 4,091 in 3,203 posts
Likes Given: 471
(04-06-2023, 12:25 PM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: If your children cannot qualify for a place in medical school and you badly want them to be doctors, what choices do you have other than send them overseas? Same goes for other professions. Should our universities lower their standards so that they can become doctors? And mind you, I have friends who are doctors but do not have fantastic grades so a lot depend on your performance during the interview.
This country is in such a sh*t state now because of whiners like you and the govt has to bow down to many of your requests. Go get a job instead of watching so many online videos.
Singapore is not training our own people to the fullest. The evidence is those who can't get into local universities go overseas and are trained to be professionals and able to take up jobs that would otherwise go to foreigners.
It is not about govt bowing down but for a govt to do fulfil it's responsibility to the people.
In fact the govt should not be allowed to take the easy way out to import people...it priority is with its own citizens.
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2023, 04:13 PM by
sgbuffett.)
Posts: 21,941
   
Threads: 6,199
    
Likes Received: 4,091 in 3,203 posts
Likes Given: 471
(04-06-2023, 02:14 PM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: If you compare the number of places given to Singaporeans to that i nthe past, you'll find that this number has increased tremendously. But has the quality of degree holders improved? The answer is no. I've seen plenty of local degree holders who cannot make it. These people would not even have gotten into university in the past had the government not open up more places for them. And yet, these exact same people now demand that they should be paid a lot more because they have a degree, despite having worse performance than diploma holders.
In reality, the intelligence of a population cannot be trained. It all boils down to statistics. The number of clever people in a country is just limited to that few number. Even if the rest can get a degree they're just not as capable. No amount of training can transform them into thinkers.
Throughout this thread you have made assertions without statistics or comparison. If you claim there is enough opportunity.....what is there to show 'enough'
Since you mention IQ Singapore population has the highest IQ among developed Asian countries but lowest level of university education among Taiwan, Japan, S. korea. So how can it be enough?...
If those who cannot get into our university but can be trained to take up higher jobs overseas how can the govt claim it is doing it's best to develop our people.
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2023, 04:19 PM by
sgbuffett.)
Posts: 14,056
   
Threads: 480
    
Likes Received: 5,952 in 4,752 posts
Likes Given: 4,607
I am not as stupid as Jac Fart King talking without brains
In those Top 10 Companies, actually only 5% are real talents holding the fort
so PAP's floodgates in the past 15 years has a hidden agenda
OK?
Why do we need 5 Mayors and 80 PAP Ministers?
>
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2023, 04:25 PM by
Ola.)
Posts: 11,350
   
Threads: 774
    
Likes Received: 3,576 in 2,933 posts
Likes Given: 475
(04-06-2023, 04:16 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: Throughout this thread you have made assertions without statistics or comparison. If you claim there is enough opportunity.....what is there to show 'enough'
Since you mention IQ Singapore population has the highest IQ among developed Asian countries but lowest level of university education among Taiwan, Japan, S. korea. So how can it be enough?...
If those who cannot get into our university but can be trained to take up higher jobs overseas how can the govt claim it is doing it's best to develop our people.
I don't agree that the IQ of Spore population is the highest. There may be some news on it but I don't agree with it at all. Also, do you have any evidence that we have the lowest university education among those nations you mentioned?
There will always be people who couldn't get into university but are capable enough, but it does not mean that our system is flawed. Same as we can have highly intelligent people failing exams but in fact they're good, can we say that the exams are a failure?
There are so many universities now and you say that our locals dun have enough opportunities? Do you really want to lower the standards of our universities so much that anyone can enter them?
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)