![[Image: FB-IMG-1746514887376.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/MydF1Rjr/FB-IMG-1746514887376.jpg)
- What is your overall impression of the statement? Does it adequately address the concerns raised by the photos?
- How does the statement make you feel about the ministers' judgment and due diligence in their public roles?
- Do you think the ministers' explanation is convincing? Why or why not?
Lack of Specifics:
- What kind of "friend" invited the ministers to these dinners? What makes this friend a reliable source of information about the attendees?
- Were there any other notable individuals present at these dinners besides Su Haijin? What does this tell us about the nature of these events?
"Happened to be there" Explanation:
- Is it plausible that Su Haijin "happened to be there" at two separate dinners attended by the ministers? How likely is this scenario?
- Do you think the ministers should have been more aware of the attendees at these dinners, given their public roles?
No Prior Knowledge Claim:
- Even if the ministers didn't know about Su Haijin's illegal activities beforehand, is it sufficient to claim "no prior knowledge" without discussing any steps taken to assess the attendees?
- Did the ministers make any effort to determine the background of the attendees at these dinners, or were they solely focused on the invitation?
Focus on Procedure, Not Substance:
- Does the statement adequately address the potential for negative optics and public perception of the ministers' association with a gang member?
- Does the statement's emphasis on maintaining high standards sufficiently address the fact that the ministers were photographed with a known gang member?
"Unsavory" as a Catch-All:
- Do you find the term "unsavory" a fitting description for someone who is facing serious criminal charges? Does it minimize the severity of the situation?
- Would the statement have been more effective if it had addressed the nature of Su Haijin's alleged illegal activities directly?
Lack of Proactive Response:
- Do you think the ministers could have taken steps to prevent these photos from circulating in the first place? How could they have been more proactive?
- Would a more proactive approach have been more effective in mitigating potential damage to the ministers' reputations?