[Obamao]

Oyk Wrote:  

When presenter with facts which you felt impotent to refute, you resort to attacking me instead of my points.

That's the one common denominator among:

1. The 39%
2.  Antivaxxers
3.. Admin

Use vulgar language, launch ad hominem attacks, twist and turn, more ad hominem attacks, post one part disinformation along with 99 parts truth, the usual arsenal.  

If you only have 2 friends who live in fear of the virus, and wear a surgical mask over a n95 mask, and did not go to places which our government had previously forbidden them to go anyway, that's not a good sample that any statisitician would use wor. If you have 10,000 antivaxxer-friends to show who are doing fine, we can sit down and talk..

[Obamao]

[Blasterlord2]

Strangely, all those attributes that he accused others of having, he himself is guilty of them, and has even carried it out further than anyone of us.

Resorting to personal attacks instead of going for the points is one of his "strengths", and so is "twisting and turning", using some parts of truth to cover up for majority of untruths.

[ODA TETSURO]

Why take it so seriously? Anyone can curse or abuse me too becos in forums, we are not our real identity, we are not ourselves, we play a role to troll, create laughters or rant...

[aiptasia]

Ceca pundek pukimak Oyk is a total hypocrite just like his cow dung eating brethren.

Kick his butt anytime he posts shite here. Keeps saying edmw is superior yet still hanging around in sgtalk. Ptooi to this mutha fugger SOB!

[sgh]

Ceca pundek pukimak Oyk is a total hypocrite just like his cow dung eating brethren.

Kick his butt anytime he posts shite here. Keeps saying edmw is superior yet still hanging around in sgtalk.  Ptooi to this mutha fugger SOB!

Curious to know what is SOB? Son of a mother dog?

[Obamao]

Oyk Wrote:
It's all in the literature. Some had mild side effects, others had side effects so severe that they died.

The reason why WHO recommended the mRNA vaccine was that the upside potential for protection was bigger than the downside risk of developing adverse side effects.

It's a calculated risk we all didn't like to take; we'd wish that COVID-19 didn't exist in the first place which upended every plan we had for our life. Unfortunately we didn't have a choice. The virus was spreading like a bush fire, it was not for us to choose if it should exist and if it should spread.

[Obamao]

Oyk Wrote: 
It's all in the literature. Some had mild side effects, others had side effects so severe that they died.

The reason why WHO recommended the mRNA vaccine was that the upside potential for protection was bigger than the downside risk of developing adverse side effects.

It's a calculated risk we all didn't like to take; we'd wish that COVID-19 didn't exist in the first place which upended every plan we had for our life. Unfortunately we didn't have a choice. The virus was spreading like a bush fire, it was not for us to choose if it should exist and if it should spread.

How eloquent, his sales script.


https://sgtalk.net/Thread-Wah-lau-So-man...#pid794555

[singaporean1964]

i tot mRNA already a proven toxin many times over

how come still got pple beLIEve its a covid medicine

[Obamao]

[Obamao]

[EvertonDiehard]

People who get upset on forums are like the audience who get worked up by jokes from a stand-up comedian! Those who are super sensitive should not be on either platform.