SG needs foreign talent to ensure long-term economic growth to everyone’s benefit
#1

https://www.straitstimes.com/business/si...-s-benefit
Reply
#2

(05-12-2022, 08:18 PM)mrclubbie Wrote:  https://www.straitstimes.com/business/si...-s-benefit

That is a wrong policy... Angry
[+] 3 users Like debono's post
Reply
#3

This is a hilarious monkey. Benefit everyone is a sweeping statement but more accurately, it benefits the Govt and FTs more than us. That is the crucial difference.
[+] 4 users Like Wy:Nox's post
Reply
#4

(05-12-2022, 08:18 PM)mrclubbie Wrote:  https://www.straitstimes.com/business/si...-s-benefit

bird talk.
[+] 1 user Likes K88 shu shu's post
Reply
#5

It benefits PAP more than anything else with 25k new voters annually. Politically driven.
[+] 3 users Like Dan's post
Reply
#6

Addicted to foreign trash.
No good for Sg as a whole.
物极必反。良心都给狗吃了!

Keep letting foreign trashes stealing our job.

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"
[+] 3 users Like RiseofAsia's post
Reply
#7

The worst thing is make the same mistakes for many years

BUT have they UNDO those mistakes

by checking the 7 broad areas and remove those FTs & PRs?


[Image: Quotes-Responsbility.png]

Why do we need 5 Mayors and 80 PAP Ministers? 
[+] 1 user Likes Ola's post
Reply
#8

(06-12-2022, 08:06 AM)Dan Wrote:  It benefits PAP more than anything else with 25k new voters annually. Politically driven.

that's how the East Coast GRC was won.

Heng S K say heng arg !.
[+] 2 users Like 8ighty8's post
Reply
#9

This is now NOT SINGAPOREANS FIRST but FOREIGNERS FIRST.

tomorrow will be a better day
[+] 6 users Like surfer's post
Reply
#10

(06-12-2022, 09:44 AM)surfer Wrote:  This is now NOT SINGAPOREANS FIRST but FOREIGNERS FIRST.

FT make Sg great, they will claim.
[+] 1 user Likes K88 shu shu's post
Reply
#11

(06-12-2022, 09:53 AM)K88 shu shu Wrote:  FT make Sg great, they will claim.

They will drain our singapore economy and local talent.

tomorrow will be a better day
[+] 2 users Like surfer's post
Reply
#12

(06-12-2022, 09:55 AM)surfer Wrote:  They will drain our singapore economy and local talent.

singapore is no more "our".

maybe 10 or 20 yr down the line, we had a PM from India.
[+] 1 user Likes K88 shu shu's post
Reply
#13

(06-12-2022, 09:53 AM)K88 shu shu Wrote:  FT make Sg great, they will claim.



Real genuine FTs earning $30k or $66k like Ramesh

yes, will make SG Great but 70% of them are not genuine FTs

And worst is, Mr Suay and Shoot Blank Queen even allow FTs

to fill- up NON- TECH vacancies that does not need them

Why do we need 5 Mayors and 80 PAP Ministers? 
Reply
#14

(06-12-2022, 10:00 AM)K88 shu shu Wrote:  singapore is no more "our".

maybe 10 or 20 yr down the line, we had a PM from India.
I am afraid this might happen in the not too distant future............. Angry
Reply
#15

(06-12-2022, 10:00 AM)K88 shu shu Wrote:  singapore is no more "our".

maybe 10 or 20 yr down the line, we had a PM from India.

Talking about the future , you will have to say we may have a PM from India not HAD because this is in the past tense.

tomorrow will be a better day
[+] 1 user Likes surfer's post
Reply
#16

Saying this like saying we always need to buy foreign players .. the more the merrier.

There is no shortage of talent to buy.that is for sure


Whatever number you want ....big nations have big supply.

In the end your own citizens become irrelevant.

Anyway coming from a govt that often has a disdain for competition finding ways and means to unlevel  the playing fieldagainst political opponents   ...what moral right do they have to import foreign talent to compete against citizens.

I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
[+] 2 users Like sgbuffett's post
Reply
#17

(06-12-2022, 10:04 AM)surfer Wrote:  Talking about the future , you will have to say we may have a PM from India not HAD because this is in the past tense.

me chinese helicopter. PSLE drop out. 

tks for teaching me inglish.
[+] 1 user Likes K88 shu shu's post
Reply
#18

(06-12-2022, 10:06 AM)K88 shu shu Wrote:  me chinese helicopter. PSLE drop out. 

tks for teaching me inglish.

Forums many talented guru.
[+] 1 user Likes 8ighty8's post
Reply
#19

(06-12-2022, 10:05 AM)sgbuffett Wrote:  Saying this like saying we always need to buy foreign players .. the more the merrier.

There is no shortage of talent to buy.that is for sure


Whatever number you want ....big nations have big supply.

In the end your own citizens become irrelevant.

In time to come our locals will not say this is our SINGapore but CRYapore or SOBapore. Laughing

tomorrow will be a better day
[+] 1 user Likes surfer's post
Reply
#20

(06-12-2022, 10:08 AM)8ighty8 Wrote:  Forums many talented guru.

agreed.

that is why I join forums.
Reply
#21

(06-12-2022, 10:06 AM)K88 shu shu Wrote:  me chinese helicopter. PSLE drop out. 

tks for teaching me inglish.

You are most welcome.

tomorrow will be a better day
Reply
#22

(06-12-2022, 10:08 AM)surfer Wrote:  In time to come our locals will not say this is our SINGapore but CRYapore or SOBapore. Laughing

Rotfl Laughing nudie
Reply
#23

(05-12-2022, 11:33 PM)debono Wrote:  That is a wrong policy... Angry
Old habits dies hard. A leopard wil never change its spots. Is only majority Oppositions can change their die-hard mindset.
Reply
#24

All these FTs is to keep links and make SG relevant to the world.

Of course at the expense of Sporns. Big Grin


Smile
Reply
#25

(06-12-2022, 03:56 PM)Niubee Wrote:  All these FTs is to keep links and make SG relevant to the world.

Of course at the expense of Sporns. Big Grin


Only the 61% believe is such bullsheet

It is their Business that can/ cannot help SG to be relevant

we only need the Top 2 Levels unless it is new sector 

So there is no need to bring in EXCESS FTs anyhow and carelessly

Why do we need 5 Mayors and 80 PAP Ministers? 
Reply
#26

he 'chee hong' again
kena voted out becos of this
now still got the audacity to say it again
Reply
#27

(06-12-2022, 05:55 PM)singaporean1964 Wrote:  he 'chee hong' again
kena voted out becos of this
now still got the audacity to say it again

Upskirt name. Rotfl
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)