![[Image: Ibcar4.jpg]](https://snipboard.io/Ibcar4.jpg)
China two hundred years of humiliation started when Russia exploited a preoccupied with war China during the the first Opium war to force China to give up Outer Mnachuria !
![crying crying](https://sgtalk.net/images/smilies/Animated/crying_s.gif)
(24-03-2022, 06:55 PM)ArielCasper Wrote: Should New Mexico forcefully annexed by US, be returned to Mexico?
(24-03-2022, 07:57 PM)way Wrote: You don't agreed that China should complete the cleansing of over 200 hundred years under Ang Moh humiliation by taking back the last piece of land Outer Manchuria, stolen by Russian ang moh ?You don't agree that Mexico complete the cleansing of over 200 hundred years under Ang Moh humiliation by taking back their lost land, stolen by Russian?
(24-03-2022, 07:57 PM)way Wrote: You don't agreed that China should complete the cleansing of over 200 hundred years under Ang Moh humiliation by taking back the last piece of land Outer Manchuria, stolen by Russian ang moh ?
(24-03-2022, 08:11 PM)watchfirst9 Wrote: It seems you do not know there is treaty signed like New Mexico.
There is a black and white.
Also when ROC govt take over, they also honor whatever Qing Govt. signed.
Similar for PRC govt, their map never indicate they still claim it.
so unless you can become cn leader. then there will be war for it
(24-03-2022, 08:03 PM)ArielCasper Wrote: You don't agree that Mexico complete the cleansing of over 200 hundred years under Ang Moh humiliation by taking back their lost land, stolen by Russian?![]()
Btw, technically speaking, the last piece of land China to take back is Taiwan.
(24-03-2022, 10:32 PM)way Wrote: Ang Moh Yankee fight Ang Moh Spainiards .. their own business.Got no knowledge also learn how to google.. Ang Moh Yankee fight Ang Moh Spainiards?? If Mexico got Ang Moh Spainiards president to sign Treaties of Velasco, he still sign the Treaties as the president of Mexico..
But this is the best time for China to reclaimed stolen land of the Outer manchuria from the Ang Moh Ruskies. Do you want Ang Moh Ruskies to continue violating Chinese territories ? The Ruskies have never been weaker and are totally dependent on China for money . It is now or never to wash the last shame of 200 hundred years that China has to endure of giving up land to Ang Moh , don't you agree ?
![]()
(24-03-2022, 10:51 PM)Oyk Wrote: Go and start your own thread if you want to talk about that. Don't derail this thread. Thank you.
(24-03-2022, 11:01 PM)pervertosan Wrote: yes. dun let amdk steal China land…shameful
(24-03-2022, 08:25 PM)ArielCasper Wrote: It seems you do not know there is treaty signed when Russia take Outer Manchuria.. You logic doesn't make sense. Both sign black and white not because they want to, but because they are in the losing side.
If go by your logic, if Taiwan is an island province of Japan like Hokkaido, and Japan won the war like russia, then yes it is apple to apple comparsion. Too bad also when you are on a losing side like Japan, what you win by force get taken away by force.
If US or Russia claim Taiwan to be their at the end of the war, it would be the same like Outer Manchuria now.
(25-03-2022, 04:54 AM)ROFLMAO Wrote: So many 五毛汉奸 like gaypanda,niubee,ArielCasper,Fleetdestroyer supporting Russia invasion of China !!![]()
(25-03-2022, 07:51 AM)pervertosan Wrote: shameful hj..open leg for russian amdk to poke
Quote:The first territorial disputes between China and Russia can be traced to the 1600s when Russia encouraged its people to settle down in the region. By 1680, however, China took over control of this region, that eventually led to the signing of the Treaty of Nerchinsk in 1689 between the Qing Dynasty and Russia. Under the terms of the treaty, Russia agreed to give up its claims to this area.
Although Russia had given up this territory to the Qing dynasty, it had by no means forgotten its interests in the area. The right time to strike would come 167 years later, with the start of the Second Opium War in 1856. Having been battered by British and French during this war, China learned of Russia’s strategic build-up of military presence on its shared northern border. Russia was only willing to withdraw troops if China were to cede territory along this border.
Facing potential attacks by Russia from the north and the onslaught of British and French forces on the south, the Qing dynasty was compelled to comply with Russia demands to stave off invasion on at least one front. This led to the signing of the Treaty of Aigun in 1858, that formed much of the present day borders between Russia and China, along the Amur River. The Chinese have historically called this treaty an “unequal treaty”, one in a series of treaties signed between the Qing dynasty and neighbouring states in the region.
Kuhrt writes that there were concerns in Russia that this could lead to the Russian Far East becoming slowly absorbed within Greater China. Kurht writes: “In the 1960s, the German Sinologist Klaus Mehnert asked young Chinese who had grown up in Mao’s China what they had been taught about Vladivostok: ‘Almost all of them replied that they had been taught that the place [ie: Vladivostok] had been called Haishenwei “before the Russians took it away”.
This past week, when the Russian embassy posted a video on Weibo to acknowledge the 160th anniversary of the founding of Vladivostok, several Chinese diplomats and journalists took to social media platforms to lambast Russia for what the Chinese consider to be historical wrongs committed against them with regard to this territory. Shen Shiwei, a reporter for the state-owned broadcaster CGTN, tweeted that the Russian embassy’s Weibo post “recalled people’s memories (of) those humiliated days in (the) 1860s”.