Singapore is being too picky about its billionaires
#1

Bloomberg
Thu, 13 July 2023 at 11:23 am SGT


By Andy Mukherjee

(Bloomberg Opinion) — Singapore has seen a boom in family offices. The number of investment vehicles that oversee assets exclusively for the benefit of a single ultra-rich household has risen 22-fold over the past five years, thanks to liberal tax exemptions. But what have the wealthy brought to the table?

The short answer: Very little. The assets of those who claim these fiscal sops made up barely 2% of the US$4 trillion managed in the Asian city-state in 2021, and their linkages with its economy are practically non-existent. While opposition lawmakers would love to blame the uber-affluent foreigners for some of the property-market froth and high cost of living, the reality is that no family office has done a local residential-property transaction in the past six years

......

According to Singapore's rules that were revamped last year, the threshold for the so-called 13U tax exemption is at least S$50 million (US$37 million) in assets, and 10% of it or S$10 million — whichever is lower — should be invested in locally listed securities or startups. There had been no such stipulation earlier. Depending on their size, family offices must also spend S$500,000 to S$1 million in the domestic economy each year, up from S$200,000.

......

Of the minimum three investment professionals they’re required to hire in Singapore, at least one must now be a nonfamily member.

......

Like with any industry, lawmakers want to know how many jobs family offices are creating for locals. (Answer: 900 in three years through June 2022.) Also, given the already wide income gaps, the government doesn’t want its red carpet to become an easy pathway to citizenship — only 30 family-office owners have been granted permanent residency under the city’s Global Investor Program.

By being too choosy, Singapore may lose out.


https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/commen...48335.html
Reply
#2

Very self-contradictory article by Bloomberg. It says the wealthy brought very little to the table, then says we are too picky. If some rich people don't bring a lot of benefit to SG, of course we should be picky. There is a separate path for people with real talent.
Reply
#3

(14-07-2023, 11:40 AM)starbugs Wrote:  Very self-contradictory article by Bloomberg. It says the wealthy brought very little to the table, then says we are too picky. If some rich people don't bring a lot of benefit to SG, of course we should be picky. There is a separate path for people with real talent.

I prefer Singapore to be picky too. When I read the article, I was thinking "huh?" so I decided to post it.
[+] 1 user Likes Levin's post
Reply
#4

SG is not gonna let the paper rich to buy their way in. Social stability is more impt than those paper $


Smile
Reply
#5

Bloomberg sometimes talk too much cock
and should concentrate on the corruption cases instead
Reply
#6

Bloomberg is blur like Biden.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)