some employee claim will not get the job if that company never offer WFT option.
Whereas another side claim hard to WFH partly noise , kids etc so prefer to go office work.
(15-08-2022, 05:46 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: now again debate on WFH
some employee claim will not get the job if that company never offer WFT option.
Whereas another side claim hard to WFH partly noise , kids etc so prefer to go office work.
(15-08-2022, 06:32 PM)Ola Wrote: Even Tan SL is farny, too
Hold a public session to encourage retailers to allow more WFH
But can waitress or retail asst work from home
So now bo- pian, must include them in Progressive Wage Model
to increase their salary instead
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/tr...rs-1969451
(15-08-2022, 06:32 PM)Ola Wrote: Even Tan SL is farny, too
Hold a public session to encourage retailers to allow more WFH
But can waitress or retail asst work from home
So now bo- pian, must include them in Progressive Wage Model
to increase their salary instead
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/tr...rs-1969451
(15-08-2022, 06:44 PM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: Dunno if I should laugh at the 'funny' part or laugh at you.
(15-08-2022, 06:31 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: some want WFH some don't like
(15-08-2022, 05:46 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: now again debate on WFH
some employee claim will not get the job if that company never offer WFT option.
Whereas another side claim hard to WFH partly noise , kids etc so prefer to go office work.