[Clyde]

Gov very clever one. Whatever policy they made will have some loop holes one.

More like forcing people to jab only pfizer.

[talky]

Fuxking stupid ruling. Can take public transport but cannot go mall. ..

WHO OWNS MRT N THE BUS CO???

[wendychan]

its already a flawed and moronic policy.. and for sure its not for preotection



under 12 can do anything
as if covid wont attack them or they want the under 12 to kenna

and one can do a PET test 24 hrs before to dine in MASKLESS
BUT CANNOT do the same to enter malls with mask


quite obvious is FOOking discrimination and not they care for you

[debono]

Cannot go shopping malls then go to shopping centres or shopping complexes lor....lol!

Shopping centres and shopping complexes are considered as shopping malls, only another name for it.  Therefore, one will be unable to access to shopping centres and shopping complexes..

[Oyk]

Most ppl take the jab becaue they are forced to indirectly but not willingly. I know many who took it and regret it

This is definitely a political things when it affects our everyday life with their bad decision and policies

Lawrence Wong pointed a gun at their head?

[happyharvest]

Lawrence Wong pointed a gun at their head?

nope. he put a time bomb in their life. the only escape is to jab or suffer the consequence like lost job etc

[ArielCasper]

83% of us are vaccinated.  It will become 85% when the remaining 2% get their second shot in the arm.

That is way more than the 61% of the votes PAP got.

It may even become 86% or 87% if more antivaxxers finally drop their ball.

I am sure there are both government supporters and the oppies in that 85%, and also government supporters and oppies   among the antivaxxers.  It is not a political thing.  It is a matter of "scared, what if I take the jab and die or suffer adverse side effects"

You seem so desperate to even want to try to make it a politcial thing.

non jab (I used non jab, not all non jab are antivaxxers) didn't drop their ball.. It is more of non jab has to give in to reality that the 87% support govt discrimination against non jab..

The non jab can laugh at part of the 87% who decided not to take booster shot, because they will face the same discrimination in 2022 or 2023..

By then, there will be 3 classes again:

1st class: below 12 (if booster is not rollout to them yet)
2nd class: Above 60 (who are at higher risk based on stat)
3rd class: 12-59

[wendychan]

i like to use jab and non jab coz it aint a true "vaccine"

[Oyk]

non jab (I used non jab, not all non jab are antivaxxers) didn't drop their ball.. It is more of non jab has to give in to reality that the 87% support govt discrimination against non jab..

The non jab can laugh at part of the 87% who decided not to take booster shot, because they will face the same discrimination in 2022 or 2023..

By then, there will be 3 classes again:

1st class: below 12 (if booster is not rollout to them yet)
2nd class: Above 60 (who are at higher risk based on stat)
3rd class: 12-59

There are "non-jabbed" who are ineligible for the vaccination because of certain medical reasons, and they have my utmost sympathy.  It is good that the government is doing its utmost to protect them with the latest measures.

But for the antivaxxers to hide under the term "non jabbed" is snaky without an ounce of exaggeration.

[ArielCasper]

There are "non-jabbed" who are ineligible for the vaccination because of certain medical reasons, and they have my utmost sympathy.  It is good that the government is doing its utmost to protect them with the latest measures.

But for the antivaxxers to hide under the term "non jabbed" is snaky without an ounce of exaggeration.

You are equating non-jabbed as antivaxxers, typical way of IB to give non-jabbed a bad name, which is snaky without an ounce of exaggeration.

[Oyk]

You are equating non-jabbed as antivaxxers, typical way of IB to give non-jabbed a bad name, which is snaky without an ounce of exaggeration.

The term "non-jabbed" was coined here by a snake.

I only grabbed its head and gave it a twist.  Ouch!

[Oyk]

nope. he put a time bomb in their life. the only escape is to jab or suffer the consequence like lost job etc

That is so because you say so?

[Napoleon Porlumpar]

no more haircuts for me for a while.... will be stocking up on more bananas

why bananas ?

cut hair at normal barber shops lah.......

[Napoleon Porlumpar]

i always go daiso
its in a shopping mall
next wednesday cannot go anymore
lee sian long make daiso lost 1 customer

next Wednesday ?................not this Wednesday meh ?

[happyharvest]

That is so because you say so?

not i say so. it is so

[happyharvest]

There are "non-jabbed" who are ineligible for the vaccination because of certain medical reasons, and they have my utmost sympathy.  It is good that the government is doing its utmost to protect them with the latest measures.

But for the antivaxxers to hide under the term "non jabbed" is snaky without an ounce of exaggeration.

not anti vax but anti experimental jab. period. no need to argue so much. many anti experiemtnal jab ppl vax flu vax or hep vax before

[Blasterlord2]

There are "non-jabbed" who are ineligible for the vaccination because of certain medical reasons, and they have my utmost sympathy.  It is good that the government is doing its utmost to protect them with the latest measures.

But for the antivaxxers to hide under the term "non jabbed" is snaky without an ounce of exaggeration.

Let's get down to basics. Why do you think people do not want to take the jab? If they believe this jab has all the benefits why wouldn't they take it? The real reason is that nobody knows for sure if it has long-term side-effects. Can you be sure? Can PAP be sure? If you cannot be sure then it is for others to decide and bear the risk of not taking the jab. 

We shouldn't label them as 'snaky' a though they're devious. You make a choice, and they make theirs.

[wendychan]

why bananas ?

cut hair at normal barber shops lah.......

opps my bad
BANDANNAS LOL