[CHAOS]

https://www.straitstimes.com/world/unite...estigation

[theold]

That is why Trump cannot be a President.

[Geneco]

Need some advice who are the usual suspects who are busy pressing report buttons and "formal" complaints now that it's published in their favorite MSM lololololol...

[Geneco]

Sure gotch peepur notch happy about this lolololololololol...

[CHAOS]

UPDATED JUL 07, 2021, 07:24 PM

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/h...(July%206).

[CHAOS]

UPDATED JUL 07, 2021, 07:24 PM

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/h...(July%206).

Dangers of mRNA vaccines

“Necessity is the mother of invention:” An adage was brought to life with the emergence of the mRNA vaccine against the backdrop of the foreboding and mercurial COVID-19 pandemic. Considering a negligible adverse-effect profile and a break-neck manufacturing speed, it shone bright as the ideal vaccine candidate. However, “all that glitters is not gold,” as was evidenced by the significant reactogenicity, a host of multi-systemic side-effects, that are being reported by the vaccine recipients; which is palpably resulting in a shift of emotions for the vaccine, accounting for vaccine hesitancy. Anaphylaxis, antibody-dependent enhancements, and deaths, comprise the most serious side-effects, albeit occurring in sparing numbers. Storage and transportation require fastidious temperatures, rendering it substantially inaccessible to a country like India. The biggest jolt, however, was the unfolding of the biases in reporting vaccine efficacy, as only the attractively high numbers of the relatively equivocal relative risk reduction were reported while keeping at bay the meager numbers of the more forthright absolute risk reduction. Notwithstanding the fallacies, the mRNA vaccine still promises hope; and with the right precautions and finesse, can be potentiated, as “a watched pot never boils.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article...%20numbers.

[Geneco]

Dangers of mRNA vaccines

“Necessity is the mother of invention:” An adage was brought to life with the emergence of the mRNA vaccine against the backdrop of the foreboding and mercurial COVID-19 pandemic. Considering a negligible adverse-effect profile and a break-neck manufacturing speed, it shone bright as the ideal vaccine candidate. However, “all that glitters is not gold,” as was evidenced by the significant reactogenicity, a host of multi-systemic side-effects, that are being reported by the vaccine recipients; which is palpably resulting in a shift of emotions for the vaccine, accounting for vaccine hesitancy. Anaphylaxis, antibody-dependent enhancements, and deaths, comprise the most serious side-effects, albeit occurring in sparing numbers. Storage and transportation require fastidious temperatures, rendering it substantially inaccessible to a country like India. The biggest jolt, however, was the unfolding of the biases in reporting vaccine efficacy, as only the attractively high numbers of the relatively equivocal relative risk reduction were reported while keeping at bay the meager numbers of the more forthright absolute risk reduction. Notwithstanding the fallacies, the mRNA vaccine still promises hope; and with the right precautions and finesse, can be potentiated, as “a watched pot never boils.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article...%20numbers.

need some advice if this ish fake news and papagranda from US of A NIH to limit capabilities of mRNA vaccines so that evil CCP china can develop new bioweapon with black tongue white lung characteristics sponsored by Gain of Function tech from US of A Fauci NIH lolololololol...