![](https://i.imgur.com/CLvY2jA.png")
10-01-2023, 09:54 AM
Ong Pei Ching
10 Jan 2023 06:10AM
(Updated: 10 Jan 2023 08:47AM)
......
First, on the issue of whether the premises can be held responsible, it must first be established that the harm was preventable.
......
Whether someone is responsible for an injured child depends on whether they owe a duty of care to the child, whether they breached such a duty, and whether the damage suffered was too remote. In other words, if the accident was not foreseeable (hence, the term “freak accident”), there may be no liability.
For examples, please go to: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commenta...ty-3185141
10 Jan 2023 06:10AM
(Updated: 10 Jan 2023 08:47AM)
......
First, on the issue of whether the premises can be held responsible, it must first be established that the harm was preventable.
......
Whether someone is responsible for an injured child depends on whether they owe a duty of care to the child, whether they breached such a duty, and whether the damage suffered was too remote. In other words, if the accident was not foreseeable (hence, the term “freak accident”), there may be no liability.
For examples, please go to: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commenta...ty-3185141
