Posts: 4,131
   
Threads: 47
    
Likes Received: 538 in 494 posts
Likes Given: 149
Need some advice who ish SURE notch happy about this again lololololol 🤣
Posts: 10,839
   
Threads: 537
    
Likes Received: 2,375 in 2,018 posts
Likes Given: 1,228
(06-08-2025, 01:11 PM)revealer Wrote: There is nothing to rebuke as ST did not said China was responsible. The word “China” was mentioned twice and “Chinese” was mentioned once in the news report. When “China” was mentioned, ST referred to what Mediant’s reported. The term “Chinese” is a common nouce, it can be referring to National Chinese, Malaysian or SG Chinese.
https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/w...astructure
The Chinese is very specific in its rebuke - It is referring to the ST reporter writing which is loaded with innuendos based on "claims" from a Google-owned coy.
By playing dumb like
revealer does with "Chinese" is not going help ST credibility when all Shanmugam did was point fingers at "UNC3886" not China.

The last paragraph in the embassy Letter essentially questioned Strait Time's editorial objectivity..
What we need in addressing cyber threats is solidarity and cooperation, not mutual accusations. We hope that The Straits Times will objectively reflect the contents of this report in its future coverage.
Song Chao
First Secretary
Embassy of The People’s Republic of China in the Republic of Singapore
You've got friendly neighbours? Grow Up! - 李光耀 2013
>
Posts: 4,058
   
Threads: 303
    
Likes Received: 276 in 257 posts
Likes Given: 7
(06-08-2025, 04:56 PM)Manthink Wrote: The Chinese is very specific in its rebuke - It is referring to the ST reporter writing which is loaded with innuendos based on "claims" from a Google-owned coy.
By playing dumb like revealer does with "Chinese" is not going help ST credibility when all Shanmugam did was point fingers at "UNC3886" not China. 
The last paragraph in the embassy Letter essentially questioned Strait Time's editorial objectivity..
What we need in addressing cyber threats is solidarity and cooperation, not mutual accusations. We hope that The Straits Times will objectively reflect the contents of this report in its future coverage.
Song Chao
First Secretary
Embassy of The People’s Republic of China in the Reof Singapore
A fact is a fact. If Mediant has a public report, anyone can quote it. U can blame ST is not sensitive but u can’t rebuke anything factual unless u dun know and can’t differentiate what is a fact what is not a fact. China Embassy should just say China has nothing to do with UNC 3886 and blame ST for not been sensitive to quote China. It is then up to the readers to judge.
Omni is in my ignored list. This works well like he always bumps my post for me all the time. Thank u Omni.
>
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 07:31 PM by
revealer.)
Posts: 7,178
   
Threads: 1,981
    
Likes Received: 1,645 in 1,364 posts
Likes Given: 11,092
We all knows ST and CNA are both pro US anti China MSM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 07:48 PM by
CHAOS.)
Posts: 4,058
   
Threads: 303
    
Likes Received: 276 in 257 posts
Likes Given: 7
As a newspaper, their job is to report the news factually. If they reported the fact wrongly, u rebuke.
Omni is in my ignored list. This works well like he always bumps my post for me all the time. Thank u Omni.
>
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 07:45 PM by
revealer.)
Posts: 2,498
   
Threads: 223
    
Likes Received: 1,010 in 749 posts
Likes Given: 2,381
(06-08-2025, 07:37 PM)revealer Wrote: As a newspaper, their job is to report the news factually. If they reported the fact wrongly, u rebuke.
F...k off you stinking CECA poopjeet cunt!!
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)