[webinarian]

Omicron: good signs that Sinopharm and Sinovac shots fend off severe illness, WHO expert says

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/...end-severe    

.

[webinarian]

Only MOH "experts" xia suey Sinovac and Sinopharm.  

.

[RichDad]

So our guru Dr Gabriel Oon is right after all. Inactivated is better.

Shame on Ah Ong & our expert committee for not heeding his advice.

[Galilo_l]

So sum r not covid naive afterall

[cityhantam]

Only MOH "experts" xia suey Sinovac and Sinopharm.  

.

Ya lor!

Our AMTK leaders! 

[debono]

So our guru  Dr Gabriel Oon is right after all. Inactivated is better.

Shame on Ah Ong & our expert committee for not heeding his advice.

So now we should be vaccinated with Sinovac or Singpharm....

[webinarian]

There is a circulated comments about the skewed reporting by AMTK and banana "experts"   

Who is behind the skewed reporting of the efficacy of the Sinovac vaccine in the STRAITS TIMES, Singapore?

SKEWED BLOOMSBERG NEWSPAPER REPORT on Sinovac
Foong Swee Fong
7 hrs

This newspaper report by Bloomberg published in the ST is misleading and unethical because it selectively quotes a research but leaves out pertinent information.

The newspaper says researchers from Hong Kong has found that 2 doses of vaccine from Sinovac or Pfizer does not produce enough neutralizing antibodies to protect against Omicron.

However, for people who have had 2 doses of Pfizer’s vaccine, a booster using the same vaccine “raised protection to adequate levels”.

For people who have had 2 doses of Sinovac’s vaccine, a booster using the same vaccine “did not produce sufficient levels of neutralizing antibodies to protect against Omicron”. However, a booster using Pfizer’s vaccine produced “significantly improved protective levels of neutralizing antibodies against Omicron”.

The newspaper comments that the results are a “blow to those who have received Sinovac’s vaccine”.

But what the newspaper did not mention is that the researchers found that Sinovac’s vaccine produces much higher levels of T-cell responses which help in destroying infected cells and are thus important in limiting severity and fatal outcomes. The researchers go on to say that this finding is consistent with high levels of protection against hospitalization and death in Sinovac’s vaccine observed in Chile and Turkey despite lower antibody neutralization.

And this last part in the research is crucial, but the newspaper conveniently it left out. Studies of re-infection in animals have found that high levels of T-cell responses can compensate for inadequate neutralizing antibody response and are able to protect against different variants of concern. This, the researchers say, is the advantage of inactivated virus vaccine (Sinovac and Sinopharm) as they contain antigens that elicit strong T-cell response and may confer immunity.

Given the headline of the newspaper, “3 doses of Sinovac fail to protect against variant : Researchers”, most people would go away thinking that Sinovac’s vaccine is useless, which is not what the researchers are saying.

Newspapers are ultimately owned by entities with vested interest. The events they report, the slant in the analysis they carry as well as the one-sidedness of their reports, reveal the agendas of their masters.  

[webinarian]

So now we should be vaccinated with Sinovac or Singpharm....

Of course, I already did that from the 1st jab to the 3rd jab.  

This is to avoid the risk of myocarditis, heart inflammation and heart attack.   

.

[webinarian]

Our Singapore banana "experts" were very fast to catch on the study that found antibodies from inactivated vaccines were lesser than mRNA vaccines. They concluded mRNA is better. But the actual results were just the opposite.    

But they ignored the fact that inactivated vaccines produce a lot more T-cells that can swallow up virus. I find our banana "experts" only just echo what the western media say.     

The Indian boy Anand said those received mRNA vaccines namely US, UK, Israel and Singapore 4 countries will suffer more severe infections than even those not taking vaccines like poor African countries. The fact also showed these 4 countries have severe infection. Why those having high covering of vaccination of Pfizer and Moderna have more infections? Our banana "experts" should ask themselves this question.   

.

[mikotan]

Our MTF only follow WHO.