[theold]

"Many of the serious incidents could have been avoided through better situational awareness technologies that can help air traffic controllers and pilots detect potential runway conflicts," Shahidi said.

The Federal Aviation Administration says 35 U.S. airports are fitted with a system called ASDE-X that uses radar, satellites and a navigation tool called multilateration to track ground movements.

But National Transportation Safety Board chair Jennifer Homendy said in November the U.S. - a bellwether for airports worldwide - lacks sufficient technology to prevent incursions.

https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15101841

[Huliwang]

It is human error lah. Simi LJ technology gap.     

[theold]

Japan Coast Guard plane repeats ``on the taxiway'' and investigates the circumstances surrounding its approach to the runway

According to communication records released by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism on the 3rd, the JAL plane received permission to land from air traffic controllers at 5:44 p.m. on the 2nd. At 12:45, the Japan Coast Guard aircraft was instructed to proceed to a stopping point on the taxiway leading to the runway.

Although the Japan Coast Guard aircraft read back the instructions, it appears that the aircraft entered Runway C without contacting the controller. The collision occurred about two minutes after the controller's instructions. The captain explained that he had "received permission to enter" after the accident, and the Japan Coast Guard believes there may have been a misunderstanding of the instructions.

Hiroyuki Kobayashi, a former JAL captain and aviation critic, said, ``As far as the published communication records show, the instructions given to the Japan Coast Guard aircraft by air traffic control were appropriate, and the Japan Coast Guard aircraft also read back accurately. It's more likely that it happened."

JAL explained on the 3rd that the captain of the JAL plane said, ``The Japan Coast Guard aircraft was not visible.''

https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUE0...4A1000000/

[Blin]

Japan Coast Guard plane repeats ``on the taxiway'' and investigates the circumstances surrounding its approach to the runway

According to communication records released by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism on the 3rd, the JAL plane received permission to land from air traffic controllers at 5:44 p.m. on the 2nd. At 12:45, the Japan Coast Guard aircraft was instructed to proceed to a stopping point on the taxiway leading to the runway.

Although the Japan Coast Guard aircraft read back the instructions, it appears that the aircraft entered Runway C without contacting the controller. The collision occurred about two minutes after the controller's instructions. The captain explained that he had "received permission to enter" after the accident, and the Japan Coast Guard believes there may have been a misunderstanding of the instructions.

Hiroyuki Kobayashi, a former JAL captain and aviation critic, said, ``As far as the published communication records show, the instructions given to the Japan Coast Guard aircraft by air traffic control were appropriate, and the Japan Coast Guard aircraft also read back accurately. It's more likely that it happened."

JAL explained on the 3rd that the captain of the JAL plane said, ``The Japan Coast Guard aircraft was not visible.''

https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUE0...4A1000000/

Coast Guard plane over shot taxi way after stop sign.

[Blin]

Japan Coast Guard plane repeats ``on the taxiway'' and investigates the circumstances surrounding its approach to the runway

According to communication records released by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism on the 3rd, the JAL plane received permission to land from air traffic controllers at 5:44 p.m. on the 2nd. At 12:45, the Japan Coast Guard aircraft was instructed to proceed to a stopping point on the taxiway leading to the runway.

Although the Japan Coast Guard aircraft read back the instructions, it appears that the aircraft entered Runway C without contacting the controller. The collision occurred about two minutes after the controller's instructions. The captain explained that he had "received permission to enter" after the accident, and the Japan Coast Guard believes there may have been a misunderstanding of the instructions.

Hiroyuki Kobayashi, a former JAL captain and aviation critic, said, ``As far as the published communication records show, the instructions given to the Japan Coast Guard aircraft by air traffic control were appropriate, and the Japan Coast Guard aircraft also read back accurately. It's more likely that it happened."

JAL explained on the 3rd that the captain of the JAL plane said, ``The Japan Coast Guard aircraft was not visible.''

https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUE0...4A1000000/

Metal burnt like woods.

[Manthink]

It is human error lah. Simi LJ technology gap.     

So end of the day it is still Human error....

This time cannot blame Mother nature liao.

[grotesqueness]

Coast Guard plane over shot taxi way after stop sign.

yes the coast guard pilot complain.... where is all the traffic lights!

[singlon]

loso coastguard got clearance
Plane on runway coastguard jialat most likely smaller or lighter

[singlon]

Japan under scrutiny by the zio-anglo-american axis
every word must be correct