Why USA is so bad at protecting motorists, cyclists and pedestrians from deaths
#1

By Emily Badger and Alicia Parlapiano
Nov. 27, 2022


......

The U.S. has diverged over the past decade from other comparably developed countries, where traffic fatalities have been falling. This American exception became even starker during the pandemic. In 2020, as car travel plummeted around the world, traffic fatalities broadly fell as well. But in the U.S., the opposite happened. Travel declined, and deaths still went up.

......

Americans die in rising numbers even when they drive less. They die in rising numbers even as roads around the world grow safer. American foreign service officers leave war zones, only to die on roads around the nation’s capital.

......

In 2021, nearly 43,000 people died on American roads

......

America’s road safety record lies with a transportation system primarily designed to move cars quickly, not to move people safely.

......

The fatality trends over the last 25 years, though, aren’t simply explained by America’s history of highway development or dependence on cars. In the 1990s, per capita roadway fatalities across developed countries were significantly higher than today. And they were higher in South Korea, New Zealand and Belgium than in the U.S. Then a revolution in car safety brought more seatbelt usage, standard-issue airbags and safer car frames

......

Fatalities fell as a result, in the U.S. and internationally. But as cars grew safer for the people inside them, the U.S. didn’t progress as other countries did to prioritizing the safety of people outside them.

“Other countries started to take seriously pedestrian and cyclist injuries in the 2000s — and started making that a priority in both vehicle design and street design — in a way that has never been committed to in the United States,” Mr. Freemark said.

......

In the U.S. in the past two decades, by contrast, vehicles have grown significantly bigger and thus deadlier to the people they hit. Many states curb the ability of local governments to set lower speed limits.

......

These diverging histories mean that while the U.S. and France had similar per capita fatality rates in the 1990s, Americans today are three times as likely to die in a traffic crash

......

On empty pandemic roads, it was easy to see exactly what kind of transportation infrastructure the U.S. had built: wide roads, even in city centers, that seemed to invite speeding. By the end of 2020 in New York, traffic fatalities on those roads had surged from prepandemic times.

......

The pandemic made more apparent how much American infrastructure contributes to dangerous conditions

......

other countries have designed transportation systems where human emotion and error are less likely to produce deadly results on roadways.



Do check out the diagrams and read the thousands of comments at the end of the article at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/27/upsho...lists.html
Reply
#2

not true leh
US death rate per 100,00 vehicles is even lower than SG
US is 14.2 while SG is 20.2, which is higher than HKG/TW
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co...death_rate
Reply
#3

(24-12-2022, 01:19 PM)limpeh394 Wrote:  not true leh
US death rate per 100,00 vehicles is even lower than SG
US is 14.2 while SG is 20.2, which is higher than HKG/TW
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co...death_rate

Not true leh because death per vehicles does not apply equally one. One should not look at that figure. Should look at per population because one has to look at infrastructure and how a country planned the movement of its people. For example, if more mass transport, it will lead to less cars and less deaths.

The article is about infrasture, vehicle design, culture of the people etc, not just about vehicles.
Reply
#4

(24-12-2022, 01:26 PM)Levin Wrote:  Not true leh because death per vehicles does not apply equally one. One should not look at that figure. Should look at per population because one has to look at infrastructure and how a country planned the movement of its people. For example, if more mass transport, it will lead to less cars and less deaths.

The article is about infrasture, vehicle design, culture of the people etc, not just about vehicles.
if use per population we sure win as only 20-30% sinkies drive/ferry as pax, the rest are on relatively safe public transport
Reply
#5

Life is dirt cheap in US lah.🤣🤣🤣
Reply
#6

(24-12-2022, 01:19 PM)limpeh394 Wrote:  not true leh
US death rate per 100,00 vehicles is even lower than SG
US is 14.2 while SG is 20.2, which is higher than HKG/TW
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co...death_rate

A better or more accurate overall ranking will be to look at this as it is per 100,000 pop rather than based on vehicles: https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/caus...y-country/
Reply
#7

(24-12-2022, 01:28 PM)limpeh394 Wrote:  if use per population we sure win as only 20-30% sinkies drive/ferry as pax, the rest are on relatively safe public transport

Yup, that's the whole idea. It's all about planning and policies. Urban planning, transportation planning, vehicle designs, culture/attitude etc.
Reply
#8

(24-12-2022, 01:19 PM)limpeh394 Wrote:  not true leh
US death rate per 100,00 vehicles is even lower than SG
US is 14.2 while SG is 20.2, which is higher than HKG/TW
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co...death_rate

The ratio of people to cars is important. In SG, there is fewer than 1 vehicle for every 5 people. In US, there is 1 vehicle for every 1.2 people. Many US folks just park their cars at home since they have so many cars they can drive. Collecting cars as a hobby is cheap there.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)