Posts: 5,790
   
Threads: 878
    
Likes Received: 1,914 in 1,467 posts
Likes Given: 202
His few articles in Zaobao is just one simple and faulty emphasis "美国是现代文明社会的一个标准" (US is the standard of modern civilized society). So, only if, China to adopt this US system, the conflicts of US and China can be resolved.
There should be only one standard to achieve progress and advancement (how biased)!!!
How ridiculous! Why engage such naive and stupid so-called "expert" to write?
(This post was last modified: 23-09-2021, 10:30 AM by
webinarian.)
Posts: 40,035
   
Threads: 2,278
    
Likes Received: 5,807 in 5,066 posts
Likes Given: 4,083
Posts: 8,063
   
Threads: 17
    
Likes Received: 1,565 in 1,317 posts
Likes Given: 525
he is one of those behind
Posts: 6,027
   
Threads: 1,513
    
Likes Received: 1,460 in 1,219 posts
Likes Given: 9,667
(23-09-2021, 10:26 AM)webinarian Wrote: His few articles in Zaobao is just one simple and faulty emphasis "美国是现代文明社会的一个标准" (US is the standard of modern civilized society). So, only if, China to adopt this US system, the conflicts of US and China can be resolved.
There should be only one standard to achieve progress and advancement (how biased)!!!
How ridiculous! Why engage such naive and stupid so-called "expert" to write?
One of our die hard White man worshipper in SG
(This post was last modified: 23-09-2021, 11:22 AM by
CHAOS.)
Posts: 5,790
   
Threads: 878
    
Likes Received: 1,914 in 1,467 posts
Likes Given: 202
23-09-2021, 12:48 PM
(23-09-2021, 10:32 AM)cityhantam Wrote: 作者是在 美国 的
国际文化战略研究和咨询专家
他是
砖家 ...
(This post was last modified: 23-09-2021, 12:50 PM by
webinarian.)
Posts: 8,063
   
Threads: 17
    
Likes Received: 1,565 in 1,317 posts
Likes Given: 525
Posts: 18,026
   
Threads: 2,079
    
Likes Received: 4,821 in 4,086 posts
Likes Given: 722
(23-09-2021, 10:26 AM)webinarian Wrote: His few articles in Zaobao is just one simple and faulty emphasis "美国是现代文明社会的一个标准" (US is the standard of modern civilized society). So, only if, China to adopt this US system, the conflicts of US and China can be resolved.
There should be only one standard to achieve progress and advancement (how biased)!!!
How ridiculous! Why engage such naive and stupid so-called "expert" to write?
断章取义,胡说八道。
“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"
>
(This post was last modified: 23-09-2021, 01:00 PM by
RiseofAsia.)
Posts: 5,797
   
Threads: 371
    
Likes Received: 1,561 in 1,380 posts
Likes Given: 2,050
Standard includes any how open fire n mass shootings of innocent lives? this commentary is appalling
There is no right or wrong decisions.
One only has to bear the consequences that one makes
>
(This post was last modified: 23-09-2021, 07:33 PM by
Galilo_l.)
Posts: 5,790
   
Threads: 878
    
Likes Received: 1,914 in 1,467 posts
Likes Given: 202
(23-09-2021, 12:59 PM)RiseofAsia Wrote: 断章取义,胡说八道。
FLG of course disagreed.
Just see the following rebuttal of the "expert", (伟达) writing. He pointed the same point as I said.
How can you start an article already with
presumption "US political system is the standard for the world" and then go on to conclude with that same assertion.
See the reply from another writer 刘春 in Zaobao.
(This post was last modified: 24-09-2021, 09:55 AM by
webinarian.)