Workers’ Party highlights 15 policies it proposed that were later adopted by PAP
#1

Workers’ Party highlights 15 policies it proposed that were later adopted by PAP government 

The Workers’ Party has spotlighted 15 policy proposals it first championed, which were later adopted by the PAP government, ahead of the upcoming 2025 General Election. The party emphasised these as collective gains for Singaporeans, despite not being the ruling party.

https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2025/04...overnment/
Reply
#2

Workers' Party Highlights 15 Policies Adopted by PAP Government
 
Title: Workers’ Party highlights 15 policies it proposed that were later adopted by PAP government
 
Source: The Online Citizen
 
Author: Not available
 
Publication Date: 2025-04-16
 
Article Summary:
 
Theme: The article highlights 15 policy proposals initially championed by the Workers' Party (WP) that were later adopted by the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) government.
 
Core Points:
 
- WP has highlighted these policies as collective gains for Singaporeans, despite not being in government.
- The article showcases a range of policies, including those related to unemployment support, anti-discrimination, flexible work arrangements, family policy, housing, healthcare, legal access, National Service pay, religious dress, and transportation.
- For each policy area, the article provides specific examples of WP's proposals and the subsequent government actions that mirrored those proposals.
 
Phenomenon: This article highlights the influence of opposition parties in shaping policy agendas even when not in power. It also highlights the use of a retrospective approach by the Workers' Party to demonstrate their contributions to Singapore's development.
Reply
#3

PAP has no foresight, Cannot plan ahead And Heartless

Their usual Group Think has failed Singapore

because Civil Service refused to speak up

no matter how much lies PAP wants to tell us repeatedly

That is why- CANNOT vote for PAP



.

Why do we need 5 Mayors and 87 PAP Ministers? 
[+] 2 users Like Ola's post
Reply
#4

every citizens residents been contributing
sacrificing their life time building this
toxicity managed nation

and whats the smallest deal did you ever get in
return?

• crime free? peaceful?

nope, certainly definitely not for the
common people

• your house?

nope, you bought it with your money

• your cpf?

nope, its blinded with full
of terms and conditions

• your job?

nope, unless its a spare role else a foreigner would be preferred

• cdc vouchers?

nope, they are given per household not individually

etc





what did the ruling party gain in return?

aplenty

- highly paid jobs reserved for themselves

- job hopping opportunity just for them

- worlds no.1 government to name and shame citizens

- the power to say whatever they please and even against basic morality

- money to be spent as and when they like;
tax payers mmoney on a pop singer

- sets of law meant just to protect them
(how many did these laws been used onto them instead of others?)

- criminal protection/home detention order just for their buddy

etc etc etc etc but definitely much more than the first mentioned

your country
or
their country?

for the interest of the people
or
for the interest of the party?
[+] 1 user Likes KILLjoy's post
Reply
#5

(17-04-2025, 11:29 AM)Ola Wrote:  PAP has no foresight, Cannot plan ahead And Heartless

Their usual Group Think has failed Singapore

because Civil Service refused to speak up

No matter how much lies PAP wants to tell us repeatedly

That is why- CANNOT vote for PAP



.

speak correct no points, speak wrongly kenna mark... who wants to speak up. On surface we are democracy, in actual fact we are ... We are just a bunch of soldiers wearing different uniform but have to obey the superior command.
[+] 2 users Like wulala's post
Reply
#6

PAP refused to TRANSFORM after 20 YEARS of reminder

They can only change like tortise and make some minor improvements

Yet Army General want to cover- up by encouraging FAKE Learning

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/p...-chun-sing

Why do we need 5 Mayors and 87 PAP Ministers? 
[+] 1 user Likes Ola's post
Reply
#7

Any idiot wants to believe what PAP says

that the system works well . . . .

BUT! only for them but not for us

Having more YES MEN will not change anything

Why do we need 5 Mayors and 87 PAP Ministers? 
[+] 1 user Likes Ola's post
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)