31-03-2024, 02:15 PM
![Smile Smile](https://sgtalk.net/images/smilies/smile.png)
(31-03-2024, 02:15 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]I noticed last time LKY aim communist etc claim it harm the country. Later once he rule SG , I notice the way how he managed tactically speaking is communist ways of managed.
(31-03-2024, 02:18 PM)Niubee Wrote: [ -> ]What is communism ?
(31-03-2024, 02:15 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]I noticed last time LKY aim communist etc claim it harm the country. Later once he rule SG , I notice the way how he managed tactically speaking is communist ways of managed.
(31-03-2024, 02:19 PM)Jinwului Wrote: [ -> ]everything is fake
(31-03-2024, 02:26 PM)Manthink Wrote: [ -> ]LKY isn't as dumb as some in the 1960s believing anti-Communism will bring better life to avg pple.
Just look at M'sia and Philippines today vs Communist Vietnam...
That is why LKY was "tactical" when comes to implementing socialism in SG domestic policies from housing, to education to defining "human rights".
(31-03-2024, 02:15 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]I noticed last time LKY aim communist etc claim it harm the country. Later once he rule SG , I notice the way how he managed tactically speaking is communist ways of managed.
(31-03-2024, 02:32 PM)winbig Wrote: [ -> ]Section 377A was repealed for your sake. How can SG be communist?
(31-03-2024, 02:28 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]Actually LKY dream is ONE Party rule but our pledge claim " democracy " next SG join UN , also depend a lot from USA not just China thus he so call play " half " , Half Communist way of ruling another side so call " democracy got Opposition Parties ".
(31-03-2024, 02:32 PM)winbig Wrote: [ -> ]Section 377A was repealed for your sake. How can SG be communist?
(31-03-2024, 02:32 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]You think what? Is PAP want Gay and Lesbian votes rah.
(31-03-2024, 02:36 PM)Manthink Wrote: [ -> ]Please lah - why you so gullible one - All leaders dream of "one party rule" lah....tell me which one willing give up their power when giving the choice not to ?![]()
The brand "Communist" exist not because pple wants freedom or "democracy" but rather they are fedup with lousy leadship and gov.
Countries like Japan, Msia, S Korea and yes Pinoyland changing leadership every few years is because the same clowns keep coming back after every elections.
(31-03-2024, 02:39 PM)Manthink Wrote: [ -> ]FYI, China legalised homosexuals 27 years ahead of SG leh.
(31-03-2024, 02:44 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]Pls rah where got look at USA , UK , other countries. They not into Communist.
(31-03-2024, 02:45 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]Yea , they also wanna get more people support the Govt mah. Just like what this current PAP is doing.
(31-03-2024, 02:15 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]I noticed last time LKY aim communist etc claim it harm the country. Later once he rule SG , I notice the way how he managed tactically speaking is communist ways of managed.
(31-03-2024, 02:15 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]I noticed last time LKY aim communist etc claim it harm the country. Later once he rule SG , I notice the way how he managed tactically speaking is communist ways of managed.
(31-03-2024, 02:15 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote: [ -> ]I noticed last time LKY aim communist etc claim it harm the country. Later once he rule SG , I notice the way how he managed tactically speaking is communist ways of managed.
(31-03-2024, 03:26 PM)EvertonDiehard Wrote: [ -> ]S'pore's style of authoritarian rule has been called a socialist democracy, but because we have free elections, we cannot be referred to as a communist state.
(31-03-2024, 03:26 PM)EvertonDiehard Wrote: [ -> ]S'pore's style of authoritarian rule has been called a socialist democracy, but because we have free elections, we cannot be referred to as a communist state.
(31-03-2024, 03:30 PM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: [ -> ]Nobody has ever said that a communist state cannot have free elections.
(31-03-2024, 02:36 PM)Manthink Wrote: [ -> ]Please lah - why you so gullible one - All leaders dream of "one party rule" lah....tell me which one willing give up their power when giving the choice not to ?![]()
The brand "Communist" exist not because pple wants freedom or "democracy" but rather they are fedup with lousy leadship and gov.
Countries like Japan, Msia, S Korea and yes Pinoyland changing leadership every few years is because the same clowns keep coming back after every elections.
(31-03-2024, 05:32 PM)EvertonDiehard Wrote: [ -> ]A communist state may have elections, but they are anything but free. Sham seems like a far more appropriate term. LOL!
(31-03-2024, 05:41 PM)ArielCasper Wrote: [ -> ]Agreed. Even Taiwan who claim to be democratic, the moment ruling party has taste of power, they did what the ppl who they topple in election, if not worse.
Now if Taiwanese tell me they are more democratic than govt, I will laugh until I fall off my chair.
(31-03-2024, 03:26 PM)EvertonDiehard Wrote: [ -> ]S'pore's style of authoritarian rule has been called a socialist democracy, but because we have free elections, we cannot be referred to as a communist state.
(31-03-2024, 06:01 PM)Manthink Wrote: [ -> ]Any ideology can be turn into a "sham" when political leadership screw the people whom they have entrust upon. For e.g.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1769652
(31-03-2024, 06:16 PM)moonrab Wrote: [ -> ]To the commoners, whether communist or democracy, as long as our living conditions are acceptable. That's the country they wanted. Got job, house, savings, insurance, medical care, transportation, recreation, shopping, travelling, social welfare, etc. It makes more sense to support the government with such capability. Ideology is the makings of an individual or particularly group's creativity. Not necessary benefiting the majority common people livings.
(31-03-2024, 06:20 PM)EvertonDiehard Wrote: [ -> ]Greed is not corruption if it can be "legitimised" by law