SG Talk

Khan planted by the white greedy pirates?

With the statement she made in the inquiry, if indeed they are true, the credibility of WP leaders are gone.

During the GE, pap brought up Khan racist social media......
But many opposition supporters favour her...blame PAP. 
Even Pritam standby her as MP heroically.
Remember?

Now who claims she is a mole..??

(04-12-2021, 10:25 PM)moonrab Wrote: [ -> ]During the GE, pap brought up Khan racist social media......
But many opposition supporters favour her...blame PAP. 
Even Pritam standby her as MP heroically.
Remember?

Now who claims she is a mole..??

Human nature. Don't trust human too much. 

(04-12-2021, 10:25 PM)moonrab Wrote: [ -> ]During the GE, pap brought up Khan racist social media......
But many opposition supporters favour her...blame PAP. 
Even Pritam standby her as MP heroically.
Remember?

Now who claims she is a mole..??

Given the remarks were on social media made when she was in her twenties some leeway was given. 

However, this episode, she made a number of errors undermining those whose primary intention was to help her.

Matter is upon the Committee.
Witnesses were called including the said Lier
and the matter got a life of its own

Said Lier did not has undue stress. Strange. Allegedly

(04-12-2021, 10:06 PM)kangtangman Wrote: [ -> ]With the statement she made in the inquiry, if indeed they are true, the credibility of WP leaders are gone.

What you said is true....only because of the way COP was conducted and  that COP did not call Pitram and Slyvia to establish the truth.

Also they use a technique called "leading the witness" to conform statements. For example the phrases "maintain the lie' , "stick to the lie" did not come from RK but from the COP member. These phrases and word "lie" did not come from RK.

The way to COP questioned RK is one sided. In a congressional hearing both parties get to question the witness to prevent biasness....because witness can be led by questions ..

Seven early eight early I already said this smelly khan will spell trouble for the WP. Right from the early days of her racially motivated statements. WP’s fault is in not recognising her insidious character and nature. Never go near a smelly khan

(05-12-2021, 07:34 AM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]Seven early eight early I already said this smelly khan will spell trouble for the WP.  Right from the early days of her racially motivated statements.  WP’s fault is in not recognising her insidious character and nature. Never go near a smelly khan

I think she is more "tactless" and unintelligent than she is insidious.

My assessment is she does thing without thinking and planning  rather than out to cause harm.

(05-12-2021, 06:41 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]What you said is true....only because of the way COP was conducted and  that COP did not call Pitram and Slyvia to establish the truth.

Also they use a technique called "leading the witness" to conform statements. For example the phrases "maintain the lie' , "stick to the lie" did not come from RK but from the COP member. These phrases and word "lie" did not come from RK.

The way to COP questioned RK is one sided. In a congressional hearing both parties get to question the witness to prevent biasness....because witness can be led by questions ..

How about the text msg in her WhatsApp? 
"Best thing to do is to take the information to the grave"
Isn't this clear enough?

(05-12-2021, 07:34 AM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]Seven early eight early I already said this smelly khan will spell trouble for the WP.  Right from the early days of her racially motivated statements.  WP’s fault is in not recognising her insidious character and nature. Never go near a smelly khan

Bingo......

(04-12-2021, 08:56 PM)Tangsen Wrote: [ -> ]Khan planted by the white greedy pirates?

Not likely, more likely she implanted by nwo. 
She bring stir hate ideas from social media platform to parliament.