09-09-2024, 09:36 AM
09-09-2024, 09:38 AM
09-09-2024, 09:47 AM
Beware! many old White man are paedophile
09-09-2024, 09:50 AM
(09-09-2024, 09:47 AM)CHAOS Wrote: [ -> ]Beware! many old White man are paedophile
99% paedo come from white people
09-09-2024, 11:30 AM
......
In April this year, Republican Senator Shannon Grove put forward a bill that would have made soliciting a minor for sex, or agreeing to engage in any form of commercial sex with a child, a felony offence, carrying a mandatory jail time and a requirement for sex offender registration for repeat offenders.
......
However, LGBTQ+ activists, opposed the bill citing concerns about “unintended consequences”. They claimed that increased penalties for those who abuse minors caught up in the sex trade will affect the LGBTQ+ community “disproportionately”.
......
You might think that harsher penalties for buying and selling children for sex should be a no-brainer
......
They went on to state that “LGBTQ+ individuals are nine times more likely to be charged with sex crimes, and are thus more likely to be incarcerated – which will in turn lead to increased difficulties in finding housing and employment.”
.......
Why on earth should an exception be made for LGBTQ+ identified abusers? Do children suffer less when they are used and abused by someone who claims to be a victim of discrimination themselves, for whatever reason?
In the end, Public Safety Committee made several amendments to Grove’s bill to please these activists that significantly weakened it.
.......
Who would have thought that in the US state of California, it would be this difficult to protect children from men wanting to purchase them for sex?
And why is the California LGBTQ+ community trying to frame soliciting of children for sex as part of a sexual identity rather than a depraved, inexcusable crime? Shouldn’t it be a source of shame, rather than a line of advocacy, that some members of the community – namely gay men – seem to be affected disproportionately by efforts to stop people from buying sex from prostituted minors? Shouldn’t these activists focus their energy on stopping gay abusers of children rather than trying to shield them from consequences of their harmful actions?
......
Today, the movement seems to be opposing common sense efforts to protect children by claiming prostitution, and specifically under-age prostitution, is an integral part of gay male culture and anti-prostitution measures are being coopted to entrap and criminalise “queer people”.
This is unacceptable. Defence of prostitution under the ever widening umbrella of the LGBTQ+ movement harms women and children, and makes it increasingly difficult to protect them from abusers. Further, it feeds into the age old efforts to equate male same sex attraction with child abuse
In April this year, Republican Senator Shannon Grove put forward a bill that would have made soliciting a minor for sex, or agreeing to engage in any form of commercial sex with a child, a felony offence, carrying a mandatory jail time and a requirement for sex offender registration for repeat offenders.
......
However, LGBTQ+ activists, opposed the bill citing concerns about “unintended consequences”. They claimed that increased penalties for those who abuse minors caught up in the sex trade will affect the LGBTQ+ community “disproportionately”.
......
You might think that harsher penalties for buying and selling children for sex should be a no-brainer
......
They went on to state that “LGBTQ+ individuals are nine times more likely to be charged with sex crimes, and are thus more likely to be incarcerated – which will in turn lead to increased difficulties in finding housing and employment.”
.......
Why on earth should an exception be made for LGBTQ+ identified abusers? Do children suffer less when they are used and abused by someone who claims to be a victim of discrimination themselves, for whatever reason?
In the end, Public Safety Committee made several amendments to Grove’s bill to please these activists that significantly weakened it.
.......
Who would have thought that in the US state of California, it would be this difficult to protect children from men wanting to purchase them for sex?
And why is the California LGBTQ+ community trying to frame soliciting of children for sex as part of a sexual identity rather than a depraved, inexcusable crime? Shouldn’t it be a source of shame, rather than a line of advocacy, that some members of the community – namely gay men – seem to be affected disproportionately by efforts to stop people from buying sex from prostituted minors? Shouldn’t these activists focus their energy on stopping gay abusers of children rather than trying to shield them from consequences of their harmful actions?
......
Today, the movement seems to be opposing common sense efforts to protect children by claiming prostitution, and specifically under-age prostitution, is an integral part of gay male culture and anti-prostitution measures are being coopted to entrap and criminalise “queer people”.
This is unacceptable. Defence of prostitution under the ever widening umbrella of the LGBTQ+ movement harms women and children, and makes it increasingly difficult to protect them from abusers. Further, it feeds into the age old efforts to equate male same sex attraction with child abuse
09-09-2024, 12:12 PM
(09-09-2024, 09:38 AM)Levin Wrote: [ -> ]https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world/...ffense-for
These folks are crazy 🤪
Please don't come to Asia...😄
09-09-2024, 12:22 PM
(09-09-2024, 11:30 AM)Levin Wrote: [ -> ]......
In April this year, Republican Senator Shannon Grove put forward a bill that would have made soliciting a minor for sex, or agreeing to engage in any form of commercial sex with a child, a felony offence, carrying a mandatory jail time and a requirement for sex offender registration for repeat offenders.
......
However, LGBTQ+ activists, opposed the bill citing concerns about “unintended consequences”. They claimed that increased penalties for those who abuse minors caught up in the sex trade will affect the LGBTQ+ community “disproportionately”.
......
You might think that harsher penalties for buying and selling children for sex should be a no-brainer
......
They went on to state that “LGBTQ+ individuals are nine times more likely to be charged with sex crimes, and are thus more likely to be incarcerated – which will in turn lead to increased difficulties in finding housing and employment.”
.......
Why on earth should an exception be made for LGBTQ+ identified abusers? Do children suffer less when they are used and abused by someone who claims to be a victim of discrimination themselves, for whatever reason?
In the end, Public Safety Committee made several amendments to Grove’s bill to please these activists that significantly weakened it.
.......
Who would have thought that in the US state of California, it would be this difficult to protect children from men wanting to purchase them for sex?
And why is the California LGBTQ+ community trying to frame soliciting of children for sex as part of a sexual identity rather than a depraved, inexcusable crime? Shouldn’t it be a source of shame, rather than a line of advocacy, that some members of the community – namely gay men – seem to be affected disproportionately by efforts to stop people from buying sex from prostituted minors? Shouldn’t these activists focus their energy on stopping gay abusers of children rather than trying to shield them from consequences of their harmful actions?
......
Today, the movement seems to be opposing common sense efforts to protect children by claiming prostitution, and specifically under-age prostitution, is an integral part of gay male culture and anti-prostitution measures are being coopted to entrap and criminalise “queer people”.
This is unacceptable. Defence of prostitution under the ever widening umbrella of the LGBTQ+ movement harms women and children, and makes it increasingly difficult to protect them from abusers. Further, it feeds into the age old efforts to equate male same sex attraction with child abuse
"They went on to state that “LGBTQ+ individuals are nine times more likely to be charged with sex crimes:
Why LGBTQ+ need to have sex with minor? 🤔
What is the reason behind it?
If it is true, wouldn't it put our minors at high risk?
Children must avoid contact with LGBTQ+ at all cost?
Hmm...