SG Talk

Former ST political desk journalist: We were not allowed to report on good opposition candidates or highlight anything good about them

https://www.bannedsite.com/forum/current...about-them

Cuz they dun hv d virtue to check ownself... jus ask dat rèform parti

(17-01-2022, 10:58 PM)Galilo_l Wrote: [ -> ]Cuz they dun hv d virtue to check ownself... jus ask dat rèform parti

Quote:I get super worked up when I hear people say "opposition candidates are not good". I also feel bad because as a journalist on the Straits Times political desk, I was part of the media machinery that helped perpetuate this image.


There always have been really good opposition candidates who dared to put themselves up for election - you just never heard about them because we were not allowed to report on good opposition candidates or highlight anything good about them. But news of silly minor things that made them look bad - those we played up.

Why she never kena umbraged?

Nice titties

Quote: There always have been really good opposition candidates who dared to put themselves up for election - you just never heard about them because we were not allowed to report on good opposition candidates or highlight anything good about them. But news of silly minor things that made them look bad - those we played up.

I already know long, long, long time ago. Nothing new. That is why umbrage sph is losing $$$ for so many years cos many dont want to read one sided small eye views.

all sillyporeans w avg IQ knew this way back during lky time,

coffee shop talk is more informative n accurate.

(18-01-2022, 09:48 AM)talky Wrote: [ -> ]all sillyporeans w avg IQ knew this way back during lky time,

coffee shop talk is more informative n accurate.

That is how the MIW fixed the opposition parties.........

Yup.. We all know that is the case since day 1..

But with internet, you can't shut them out totally..

Hear what the opposition candidates say, see what the opposition candidates do, and then decide for yourself whether they are worth your support..

While people see Charles Yeo as a suspect (we will let the law decide on that), I will see him as someone who took up responsibility (willingly or unwillingly) to deliver his famous speech..

He is the youngest candidate in the team, and also there are 2 other candidates who can speak Chinese, so why him for such an important sale pitch? Also, do we still remember who is the one he stand in for to speak in Chinese?? No, but we will definitely remember Mr 成何体统

(18-01-2022, 07:02 AM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]Nice titties

where?

(18-01-2022, 12:01 PM)happyharvest Wrote: [ -> ]where?

The ex ST journalist? 

(18-01-2022, 10:26 AM)ArielCasper Wrote: [ -> ]Yup.. We all know that is the case since day 1..

But with internet, you can't shut them out totally..

Hear what the opposition candidates say, see what the opposition candidates do, and then decide for yourself whether they are worth your support..

While people see Charles Yeo as a suspect (we will let the law decide on that), I will see him as someone who is willing to take up responsibility (willingly or unwillingly) to deliver his famous speech..

He is the youngest candidate in the team, and also there are 2 other candidates who can speak Chinese, so why him for such an important sale pitch? Also, do we still remember who is the one he stand in for to speak in Chinese?? No, but we will definitely remember Mr 成何体统

I concur with your findings, but these ppl. can be sued until pants drop....

(18-01-2022, 12:26 PM)debono Wrote: [ -> ]I concur with your findings, but these ppl. can be sued until pants drop....

Need to be all inclusive, must also add can be sued until panties drop....  

(18-01-2022, 12:17 PM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]The ex ST journalist? 

see nothing leh..