SG Talk

The judge has made a good decision and now MHA wants to challenge it as it was not in their favour

(07-02-2023, 04:29 PM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]The judge has made a good decision and now MHA wants to challenge it as it was not in their favour

Extra salt because the judge who made the decision is the brother of Kenneth Jeyeretnam and the son of JBJ. 

Stop reading at " High Court judge Philip Jeyaretnam ruled in a written judgment that a police officer had arrested Mr Mah in 2017 because he disliked him - not because he genuinely believed Mr Mah was a danger because of a mental disorder. "

Philip Jeyaretnam is brother of opposition party leader Kenneth Jeyaretnam..LOL.

Hahahah see rare case of govt losing a case... I think they will appeal and reverse the judgement lah. Else everyone starts suing the govt.

Pappies Gov is just sore loser
why dun they just disband the courts suah, and they make the call for every case

The minister of law unhappy that the ministry of home affairs had been found proven to be abusive of its power in a fair court judgement.
the minister of law is also the minister for home affairs.LOL .Talk cork sing song you know some ppl

(08-02-2023, 12:30 AM)Truebluesg Wrote: [ -> ]The minister of law unhappy that the ministry of home affairs had been found proven to be abusive of its power in a fair court judgement.
the minister of law is also the minister for home affairs.LOL .Talk cork sing song you know some ppl

This is what you get when you have an adulterous madman in charge.

(07-02-2023, 04:29 PM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]The judge has made a good decision and now MHA wants to challenge it as it was not in their favour

Appeal or challenge?

Should t the govt be worried about the wrongful arrest itself that resulted in an jnnocent man being locked up for nothing by the police.

Just like the young child who committed suicide after police interrogated him without a guardian being present. ....after that the police still defend their actions and claim nothing is wrong.

(08-02-2023, 12:32 AM)Basic_Strategy Wrote: [ -> ]This is what you get when you have an adulterous madman in charge.

Acting in good faith, right of self defence VS abuse of power, rash act, negligent act, ignorance of consequences 
Firm and stern voice VS rudeness, impolite, 
Different people has different interpretations.

(08-02-2023, 12:45 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]Should t the govt be worried about the wrongful arrest itself that resulted in an jnnocent man being locked up for nothing by the police.

Just like the young child who committed suicide after police interrogated him without a guardian being present. ....after that the police still defend their actions and claim nothing is wrong.

when you ownself check ownself. You can do no wrong.
I think trust is falling to an all time low.
keppel , ST, MHA, and some ppl can still claim that the public generally trust the government!
the next gov, whether white or blue
better do some serious housekeeping. Fire some mad dogs

early retirement for the judge ?

Isnt the law supposed to protect the vulnerable? So is law minister saying law should protect the enforcer? Is my interpretation correct??