SG Talk

(29-05-2023, 08:56 AM)ODA TETSURO Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe I can sign up prolific skins and post my gifs there to up their traffic? Collaboration is better than arguement...

Can, the more the merrier hee

(27-05-2023, 08:07 PM)XiXiPee Wrote: [ -> ]some of them like to post outdated shit too. haha

Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

(25-04-2024, 10:38 AM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

You will never whack it into oblivion, it is way older than this sgtalk and will live on after you and me die. If you havent forgotten, it was prolific skins that whacked the original sgtalk into oblivion with that report to ministry of law

(25-04-2024, 02:36 AM)Geneco Wrote: [ -> ]times are bad...

need to drive traffic..

even EDWM can't pander to useful idiots wrecking the forum experience LOLOLOL...

no wonder some people go KI SIAO recently...

Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

(27-05-2023, 04:36 PM)singaporean1964 Wrote: [ -> ]i think the guy that post is from profilic

Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

(25-04-2024, 10:41 AM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

You will never whack it into oblivion, it is way older than this sgtalk and will live on after you and me die. If you havent forgotten, it was prolific skins that whacked the original sgtalk into oblivion with that report to ministry of law

(25-04-2024, 10:41 AM)Nyvrem Wrote: [ -> ]You will never whack it into oblivion, it is way older than this sgtalk and will live on after you and me die. If you havent forgotten, it was prolific skins that whacked the original sgtalk into oblivion with that report to ministry of law

Just stop posting articles from that site lah.
If the site is worthy it should attract its own crowd.

(25-04-2024, 10:42 AM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

You will never whack it into oblivion, it is way older than this sgtalk and will live on after you and me die. If you havent forgotten, it was prolific skins that whacked the original sgtalk into oblivion with that report to ministry of law

(25-04-2024, 10:43 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]Just stop posting articles from that site lah.
If the site is worthy it should attract its own crowd.

The site is not worthy lah, didn't you read what reddishday say? That's why its traffic so much higher than sgtalk only

(25-04-2024, 10:43 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: [ -> ]Just stop posting articles from that site lah.
If the site is worthy it should attract its own crowd.

The problem is that it is totally unworthy.  Why do readers want to read posts copied from other websites and just thrown in with the stupid tag of prolific skins?  And the news also so outdated

(29-05-2023, 08:54 AM)Alice Alicia Wrote: [ -> ]The links don't open.
Something wrong with them.

Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

(25-04-2024, 10:49 AM)Shion Wrote: [ -> ]I am feeling real sleepy, can you please try to destroy the site harder? I want to see real anger and passion in it!

The site is so crappy that it will destroy itself without any help

(25-04-2024, 10:53 AM)Shion Wrote: [ -> ]Feeling even sleepier......

Join us!  Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

(25-04-2024, 11:21 AM)Alleggsinonebasket Wrote: [ -> ]LOL looks like ownself talk to ownself

It's a crappy website full of plagiarism.

https://sgtalk.net/Thread-Whats-with-ppl...sts?page=2

Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

(25-04-2024, 11:25 AM)Alleggsinonebasket Wrote: [ -> ]yep confirm is siao lang ownself talk to ownself. And keep repeating the same thing.

It's a crappy website full of plagiarism.

https://sgtalk.net/Thread-Whats-with-ppl...orum-posts

Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion

Upz for remembrance 

It's actually just one person using multiple sgtalk accounts to promote prolificforeskin.

Once, this fella even forgot to log out and switch account when replying to her own question. Self-exposed.

(26-04-2024, 06:24 PM)starbugs Wrote: [ -> ]It's actually just one person using multiple sgtalk accounts to promote prolificforeskin.

Once, this fella even forgot to log out and switch account when replying to her own question. Self-exposed.

Alamak, only just 1 person?  Sibei lau kwee 

I thought at least got 3 to 4 real persons desperately trying to keep the crappy website afloat 

the clown say popular forum, still need 6+  clone accounts to promote...

(27-04-2024, 04:17 AM)twinkle07 Wrote: [ -> ]the clown say popular forum, still need 6+  clone accounts to promote...

I wonder why these prolific foreskin clones don’t dare advertise their crappy website on hardwarezone?  They don’t dare chut their stunts there?

Prolific foreskins content are all stolen from other websites.  99% are just plagiarized content with tonnes of clones spewing vulgarities.  Most of the content are hopelessly outdated too.

Still, with their constant advertising here, Sgtalk Admin should do something about these lowlife clowns as they are stealing their readers away 

Worse still, I notice that these lowlife prolific skins clones like to impersonate well known nicks from other forums 

Upz for remembrance  

probably rejected from hwz, that's why steal edmwer nicks

(27-04-2024, 06:25 PM)twinkle07 Wrote: [ -> ]probably rejected from hwz, that's why steal edmwer nicks

Probably banned in hwz from promoting their useless website 

Prolific foreskins is a crappy website full of plagiarism.

https://sgtalk.net/Thread-Whats-with-ppl...orum-posts

Time to whack prolific skins into oblivion 

Actually Sgtalk forum will be a very successful forum if not for the constant spamming by the prolific skins scammers
 
Many forumers are turned off by these clones with their constant spamming to go read their highly plagiarised articles at prolific foreskins website. 

The website is just a confused mix of old rehashed articles from other websites, zero originality and tonnes of profanities 

Prolific foreskin scammers have been leeching off sgtalk forum for a long time.  Because sgtalk forum scores highly in Google's optimised searches 

(27-04-2024, 06:25 PM)twinkle07 Wrote: [ -> ]probably rejected from hwz, that's why steal edmwer nicks

both sides forumer also come here but do not post.

(28-04-2024, 09:59 AM)watchfirst9 Wrote: [ -> ]both sides forumer also come here but do not post.

Sgtalk Admin here does not know his sgtalk.net website is valuable





prolific skins lose to sgtalk in Global Rank, Country Rank, Category Rank
prolific skins lose to sgtalk in Total visits for March 2024
Bounce rate for prolific skins is a staggering 73.73% compared to SgTalk's 27.92% which means when peepur land on prolific skins websai, 73.73% will immediately siam and leave the websai
Peepur read Sgtalk average 8.16 pages per visit versus prolific skins 0.68 page per visit
Average per visit duration time on SgTalk is 10.18 mins versus prolific skin website of just 1 min per visit  

So now you know why prolific skins clones need to leech on so tightly to SgTalk

The old sgtalk.org used to circumcise the foreskin accounts as soon as they appear.

(28-04-2024, 11:25 AM)starbugs Wrote: [ -> ]The old sgtalk.org used to circumcise the foreskin accounts as soon as they appear.

The old Sgtalk Admin is more IT savvy.  

The current Sgtalk Admin doesn’t know prolific foreskins clones are totally taking advantage of the SgTalk websai to promote their own foreskin websai 

(28-04-2024, 11:15 AM)p1acebo Wrote: [ -> ]Sgtalk Admin here does not know his sgtalk.net website is valuable





prolific skins lose to sgtalk in Global Rank, Country Rank, Category Rank
prolific skins lose to sgtalk in Total visits for March 2024
Bounce rate for prolific skins is a staggering 73.73% compared to SgTalk's 27.92% which means when peepur land on prolific skins websai, 73.73% will immediately siam and leave the websai
Peepur read Sgtalk average 8.16 pages per visit versus prolific skins 0.68 page per visit
Average per visit duration time on SgTalk is 10.18 mins versus prolific skin website of just 1 min per visit  

So now you know why prolific skins clones need to leech on so tightly to SgTalk

many representatives are here. Maybe is their rice bowls.