+- SG Talk (https://sgtalk.net)
+-- Forum: SG Talk (https://sgtalk.net/Forum-SG-Talk)
+--- Forum: Market Talk (https://sgtalk.net/Forum-Market-Talk)
+--- Thread: PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics (/Thread-PAP-questions-WP-chief-Pritam-Singh-for-discussing-Singapore-politics)
PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics - Bigiron - 03-07-2025
PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics 'on foreign soil, to foreign audience'
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/pap-wp-general-election-race-religion-politics-pritam-singh-malaysia-podcast-5218376
The PAP’s arguments in the article contain several logical flaws:
- False dichotomy: Framing foreign media engagement as inherently inappropriate.
- Appeal to patriotism: Implying unpatriotic behavior without evidence of harm.
- Guilt by association: Linking Singh’s podcast to unrelated foreign endorsements.
- Selective outrage: Ignoring similar engagements by PAP leaders.
- Argument from silence: Inferring complicity from Singh’s delayed response to endorsements.
- Hasty generalization: Accusing WP of racial politicking without substantiation.
- Vague assertion: Using “politics should stop at the water’s edge” without clear application.
RE: PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics - Ola - 03-07-2025
PAP is Hypocrite, lah
will their State Owned Organ write 20 articles or
show WP 20 interviews on CH 5 and 8 per year ?
They have in the past . . . .only on BAD news to put him on bad light
ie Raeesh Khan Liar News
------------------------------------------------------
“Strikingly, he chose not a local media outlet, but a podcast hosted by Malaysians
RE: PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics - Wy:Nox - 03-07-2025
PaP represents the 65% while Opposition represents 45% of us.
Opposition can travel, visit and talk.
![[Image: IMG-3315.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/tTkTRmrL/IMG-3315.jpg)
RE: PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics - cheekopekman - 03-07-2025
(Yesterday, 06:22 PM)Bigiron Wrote: PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics 'on foreign soil, to foreign audience'
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/pap-wp-general-election-race-religion-politics-pritam-singh-malaysia-podcast-5218376
The PAP’s arguments in the article contain several logical flaws:
- False dichotomy: Framing foreign media engagement as inherently inappropriate.
- Appeal to patriotism: Implying unpatriotic behavior without evidence of harm.
- Guilt by association: Linking Singh’s podcast to unrelated foreign endorsements.
- Selective outrage: Ignoring similar engagements by PAP leaders.
- Argument from silence: Inferring complicity from Singh’s delayed response to endorsements.
- Hasty generalization: Accusing WP of racial politicking without substantiation.
- Vague assertion: Using “politics should stop at the water’s edge” without clear application.
How can he go to Malaysia and talk nonsense about Singapore leh?
