[Bigiron]

PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics 'on foreign soil, to foreign audience'

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...st-5218376

The PAP’s arguments in the article contain several logical flaws:

• False dichotomy: Framing foreign media engagement as inherently inappropriate.
  
• Appeal to patriotism: Implying unpatriotic behavior without evidence of harm.
  
• Guilt by association: Linking Singh’s podcast to unrelated foreign endorsements.
  
• Selective outrage: Ignoring similar engagements by PAP leaders.
  
• Argument from silence: Inferring complicity from Singh’s delayed response to endorsements.
  
• Hasty generalization: Accusing WP of racial politicking without substantiation.
  
• Vague assertion: Using “politics should stop at the water’s edge” without clear application.
  

[Ola]

PAP is Hypocrite, lah

will their State Owned Organ write 20 articles or

show WP 20 interviews on CH 5 and 8 per year ?

They have in the past . . . .only on BAD news to put him on bad light

ie Raeesh Khan Liar News

------------------------------------------------------
“Strikingly, he chose not a local media outlet, but a podcast hosted by Malaysians

[Wy:Nox]

PaP represents the 65% while Opposition represents 45% of us.

Opposition can travel, visit and talk.

[cheekopekman]

PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics 'on foreign soil, to foreign audience'

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...st-5218376

The PAP’s arguments in the article contain several logical flaws:

• False dichotomy: Framing foreign media engagement as inherently inappropriate.
  
• Appeal to patriotism: Implying unpatriotic behavior without evidence of harm.
  
• Guilt by association: Linking Singh’s podcast to unrelated foreign endorsements.
  
• Selective outrage: Ignoring similar engagements by PAP leaders.
  
• Argument from silence: Inferring complicity from Singh’s delayed response to endorsements.
  
• Hasty generalization: Accusing WP of racial politicking without substantiation.
  
• Vague assertion: Using “politics should stop at the water’s edge” without clear application.
  

How can he go to Malaysia and talk nonsense about Singapore leh?