![]() |
Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - Printable Version +- SG Talk (https://sgtalk.net) +-- Forum: SG Talk (https://sgtalk.net/Forum-SG-Talk) +--- Forum: Market Talk (https://sgtalk.net/Forum-Market-Talk) +--- Thread: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better (/Thread-Lawrence-Wong-No-Need-to-Cut-Fuel-Costs-100-Vouchers-are-Better) |
Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - Bigiron - 04-04-2022 Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better https://kuanyewism.com/2022/04/lawrence-wong-no-need-to-cut-fuel-costs-100-vouchers-are-better/ RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - Galilo_l - 04-04-2022 No need to pay the mps mayors every month since they r oso rich to afford the high costs of living ![]() RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - surfer - 04-04-2022 Greedy. That’s all I can say. RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - whylah - 04-04-2022 end of the day, commoner who doesn't own car will indirectly pay for the increase fuel cost. simple logic, businessman will never absorb the increase in business cost, their customers will ultimately pay for it, probably even more. yes, these people are damn greedy, and like to bulldoze their agenda across, thinking that we are daft. RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - theold - 04-04-2022 They doubled the fuel tax not long ago, right? RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - Alam - 04-04-2022 But but but what about business that need transport running on fuel? Same logic applies? RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - RichDad - 04-04-2022 The logic is not wrong but the amount is way too small. Rise in fuel costs will be passed on to consumers. $100 enough? RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - jus4lucky - 04-04-2022 no need to cut fuel cost? i think better cut the minister salary. best is cut off pap in the parliament. make sense? RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - Instinct - 04-04-2022 CDC vouchers also the cause of higher price in the hawker centres. Many hawkers are raising price to suck up the vouchers. RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - Instinct - 04-04-2022 LW is silly to think that fuel is a luxury goods. Seems like he don't know that higher fuel price lead to higher business cost that must be pass on to consumers. Govt of many countries are cutting fuel tax because they know fuel is not progressive tax. But Sg govt is ignorant. RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - Rainforest - 05-04-2022 (04-04-2022, 06:33 PM)Bigiron Wrote: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better 会有报应的 RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - menghuii - 05-04-2022 looks like idiots are running this country. idontknowhatosay ![]() RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - keys - 05-04-2022 its crazy that the fuel is so expensive .. but we need to thank US and Russia for this war that fked everyone RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - RiseofAsia - 05-04-2022 Who still believe he will be next PM? ![]() Total out of reach from general public… 羊毛出在羊身上 lah… ![]() RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - starbugs - 05-04-2022 I don't drive, so I agree voucher better, as long as bus/MRT fares don't increase ![]() RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - talky - 05-04-2022 (04-04-2022, 07:11 PM)Galilo_l Wrote: No need to pay the mps mayors every month since they r oso rich to afford the high costs of living it is not a q of whether they are rich or not it is absolutely waste ytax payer money to feed these redundant mayors,not even worth to pay them S$0.1 RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - talky - 05-04-2022 (05-04-2022, 10:04 AM)Rainforest Wrote: 会有报应的i agreed 110% RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - talky - 05-04-2022 as i hv said $100 is NEVER ENOUGH TO OFFSET THE INCREASES GIVE US $500,IT IS JUST BARELY ENOUGH ,JUST THE STARTING LEVEL WHEN OIL GOES TO $150 WILL WE GET ANOTHER $800??? RE: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better - Ernesto - 05-04-2022 These ppl will never admit that they are the one cost the inflation. Always disguise as thought they are angel by giving out voucher.Oppression is getting greater each day. |