https://kuanyewism.com/2022/04/lawrence-...re-better/
Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better
04-04-2022, 06:33 PM
Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better
https://kuanyewism.com/2022/04/lawrence-...re-better/
https://kuanyewism.com/2022/04/lawrence-...re-better/
04-04-2022, 07:11 PM
No need to pay the mps mayors every month since they r oso rich to afford the high costs of living
There is no right or wrong decisions.
One only has to bear the consequences that one makes
04-04-2022, 07:39 PM
Greedy. That’s all I can say.
tomorrow will be a better day
04-04-2022, 08:16 PM
end of the day, commoner who doesn't own car will indirectly pay for the increase fuel cost.
simple logic, businessman will never absorb the increase in business cost, their customers will ultimately
pay for it, probably even more.
yes, these people are damn greedy, and like to bulldoze their agenda across, thinking that we are daft.
simple logic, businessman will never absorb the increase in business cost, their customers will ultimately
pay for it, probably even more.
yes, these people are damn greedy, and like to bulldoze their agenda across, thinking that we are daft.
.
04-04-2022, 08:18 PM
They doubled the fuel tax not long ago, right?
04-04-2022, 08:34 PM
But but but what about business that need transport running on fuel? Same logic applies?
04-04-2022, 10:16 PM
The logic is not wrong but the amount is way too small. Rise in fuel costs will be passed on to consumers. $100 enough?
04-04-2022, 10:31 PM
no need to cut fuel cost?
i think better cut the minister salary.
best is cut off pap in the parliament.
make sense?
i think better cut the minister salary.
best is cut off pap in the parliament.
make sense?
04-04-2022, 10:31 PM
CDC vouchers also the cause of higher price in the hawker centres. Many hawkers are raising price to suck up the vouchers.
04-04-2022, 10:36 PM
LW is silly to think that fuel is a luxury goods. Seems like he don't know that higher fuel price lead to higher business cost that must be pass on to consumers. Govt of many countries are cutting fuel tax because they know fuel is not progressive tax. But Sg govt is ignorant.
05-04-2022, 10:04 AM
(04-04-2022, 06:33 PM)Bigiron Wrote: Lawrence Wong: No Need to Cut Fuel Costs. $100 Vouchers are Better
https://kuanyewism.com/2022/04/lawrence-...re-better/
会有报应的
I am just a tiny plankton in the ocean.
05-04-2022, 10:22 AM
looks like idiots are running this country.
idontknowhatosay
idontknowhatosay
05-04-2022, 10:25 AM
its crazy that the fuel is so expensive .. but we need to thank US and Russia for this war that fked everyone
05-04-2022, 10:45 AM
Who still believe he will be next PM?
Total out of reach from general public…
羊毛出在羊身上 lah…
Total out of reach from general public…
羊毛出在羊身上 lah…
“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"
05-04-2022, 10:53 AM
I don't drive, so I agree voucher better, as long as bus/MRT fares don't increase
05-04-2022, 11:06 AM
05-04-2022, 11:08 AM
05-04-2022, 11:10 AM
as i hv said $100 is NEVER ENOUGH TO OFFSET THE INCREASES
GIVE US $500,IT IS JUST BARELY ENOUGH ,JUST THE STARTING LEVEL
WHEN OIL GOES TO $150 WILL WE GET ANOTHER $800???
GIVE US $500,IT IS JUST BARELY ENOUGH ,JUST THE STARTING LEVEL
WHEN OIL GOES TO $150 WILL WE GET ANOTHER $800???
05-04-2022, 11:47 AM
These ppl will never admit that they are the one cost the inflation. Always disguise as thought they are angel by giving out voucher.Oppression is getting greater each day.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)