Posts: 680
   
Threads: 186
    
Likes Received: 388 in 324 posts
Likes Given: 26
Temasek invest into FTX. Of course must kill of binance since its their competitor
Posts: 19,564
   
Threads: 2,626
    
Likes Received: 3,255 in 2,770 posts
Likes Given: 2,188
(21-11-2022, 07:02 PM)IndianChief Wrote: Temasek invest into FTX. Of course must kill of binance since its their competitor
Singapore doesn't take sides
Singapore based on Principles
Posts: 23,509
   
Threads: 6,753
    
Likes Received: 4,257 in 3,340 posts
Likes Given: 515
The Monetary Authority of Singapore defended its stance on Binance.com and collapsed crypto exchange FTX, following criticisms about the differing treatment of the two firms since the regulator had previously alerted the public to Binance.com.
The “clear difference” between the two was that Binance.com was “actively soliciting” users in the city-state, to the extent of offering listing in Singapore dollars among other incentives, while FTX was not, the MAS said in a statement on Monday. In response to “questions and misconceptions” that it was possible to protect local users who dealt with FTX, such as by ringfencing their assets or ensuring that FTX backed its assets with reserves, the MAS reiterated that FTX isn’t licensed in the country and again warned about
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
Posts: 1,865
   
Threads: 8
    
Likes Received: 345 in 300 posts
Likes Given: 112
(21-11-2022, 05:54 PM)merline Wrote: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...emium-asia&leadSource=uverify%20wall
orce
Licking Uncle Sam by forcing Binance and Binance.sg to close the operation here while keeping FTX active.
But Binance supposed to be one to save FXT.
So karma served?
China licking own wounds now. No need other country lick them.
Posts: 23,509
   
Threads: 6,753
    
Likes Received: 4,257 in 3,340 posts
Likes Given: 515
(21-11-2022, 07:05 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: The Monetary Authority of Singapore defended its stance on Binance.com and collapsed crypto exchange FTX, following criticisms about the differing treatment of the two firms since the regulator had previously alerted the public to Binance.com.
The “clear difference” between the two was that Binance.com was “actively soliciting” users in the city-state, to the extent of offering listing in Singapore dollars among other incentives, while FTX was not, the MAS said in a statement on Monday. In response to “questions and misconceptions” that it was possible to protect local users who dealt with FTX, such as by ringfencing their assets or ensuring that FTX backed its assets with reserves, the MAS reiterated that FTX isn’t licensed in the country and again warned about
I don't understand...MAS is saying Binance was banned because it gave a better deal to users.
It just makes zero sense and is illogical
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
Posts: 406
   
Threads: 73
    
Likes Received: 238 in 157 posts
Likes Given: 404
Can post full article? cannot read becuz no subs.
Thanks.