Posts: 2,932
   
Threads: 477
    
Likes Received: 925 in 687 posts
Likes Given: 73
https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2023/07...tion-fees/
Revelations about the rental of state properties by Singapore’s Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam and Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan have led to public discussions following recent reviews conducted by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean and the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB).
Although both Ministers were absolved of any corruption allegations, the apparent conflict of interest of the Minister for Law renting from Singapore Land Authority (SLA) which he oversees, was a matter of public interest that spurred a lengthy parliamentary session on Monday (3 Jul).
Edwin Tong, Second Minister for Law, addressed these concerns in a ministerial statement, elucidating the role played by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) in managing these rentals and overseeing their restoration before the ministers moved in.
Tong explained that the restoration process, conducted in adherence to conservation guidelines, involves considerable consultancy services to identify necessary works.
In his ministerial statement, the Second Minister for Law shared that consultancy costs accounted for S$375,000 out of a total renovation bill of S$515,400 At 26 Ridout Road, which Mr Shanmugam rented.
The remaining S$140,400 was spent on actual restoration and maintenance work. This work involved the retention and restoration of original architectural features, including the main roof, original fan lights, windows, doors, vents, and other architectural elements that provide distinctive character to the building. Additional costs were incurred for tasks such as painting, pest control, and mold removal.
This implies that consultancy services accounted for a substantial 72% of the total renovation expenditure.
A similar trend was seen at 31 Ridout Road, where Dr Balakrishnan resides. Here, consultancy fees amounted to S$452,000 out of a total expenditure of S$570,500. The remaining S$118,500 was used for extensive renovations, including roof repairs and restoration of heritage features. Additionally, general repairs to the staircase, the perimeter of the house, fixing windows, and pest control were undertaken, along with unique tasks like snake climbing prevention. This indicates that nearly 79% of the total expenses were attributed to consultancy fees.
These figures from both properties, detailing a significant proportion of the expenses going towards consultancy fees rather than actual restoration work, resemble a case noted by the Auditor-General Office in its report for the Financial Year 2015/2016. The report stated that there had been an inadequate assessment of the reasonableness of a consultancy fee of S$410,000 quoted for the construction of a bin centre built by the National Arts Council (NAC) for the Victoria Theatre/Victoria Concert Hall (VT/VCH).
The AGO observed that the NAC had directly engaged the VT/VCH consultants to provide additional consultancy services amounting to S$410,000 for the construction of a bin center, without first conducting a cost assessment to ascertain the reasonableness of the fee quoted.
The AGO stated that the fee was exceptionally high at 87.2 per cent of the construction cost, S$470,000, and that there was no assurance that the fee paid by NAC was reasonable. The S$410,000 consultation fees, on top of the S$470,000 construction fees, meant that the bin center cost in total was a whopping S$880,000.
In the case of the 26 and 31 Ridout Road properties, the consultation fees were far greater proportion at 267% and 381% of the renovation costs respectively.
While the AGO conducted a selective audit on the SLA in FY2018/2019, it did not pick up this issue as it had in FY2015/2016 with the NAC bin centre. The AGO was headed by Ms Goh Soon Poh, who was newly appointed in February 2019 and has also been involved in another controversy, as she is the wife of Mr Heng Chee How, the Senior Minister of State for Defence.
Apparently, no one noticed these ratios during the parliamentary session, and the information slipped through the discussion while the Ministers and opposition were busy arguing over apparent conflicts of interest.
(This post was last modified: 03-07-2023, 11:38 PM by
Obamao.)
Posts: 2,932
   
Threads: 477
    
Likes Received: 925 in 687 posts
Likes Given: 73
Last time was the rubbish bin.
Posts: 2,932
   
Threads: 477
    
Likes Received: 925 in 687 posts
Likes Given: 73
Posts: 8,960
   
Threads: 41
    
Likes Received: 2,076 in 1,827 posts
Likes Given: 585
Posts: 701
   
Threads: 4
    
Likes Received: 175 in 157 posts
Likes Given: 175
(03-07-2023, 11:37 PM)Obamao Wrote: https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2023/07...tion-fees/
Revelations about the rental of state properties by Singapore’s Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam and Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan have led to public discussions following recent reviews conducted by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean and the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB).
Although both Ministers were absolved of any corruption allegations, the apparent conflict of interest of the Minister for Law renting from Singapore Land Authority (SLA) which he oversees, was a matter of public interest that spurred a lengthy parliamentary session on Monday (3 Jul).
Edwin Tong, Second Minister for Law, addressed these concerns in a ministerial statement, elucidating the role played by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) in managing these rentals and overseeing their restoration before the ministers moved in.
Tong explained that the restoration process, conducted in adherence to conservation guidelines, involves considerable consultancy services to identify necessary works.
In his ministerial statement, the Second Minister for Law shared that consultancy costs accounted for S$375,000 out of a total renovation bill of S$515,400 At 26 Ridout Road, which Mr Shanmugam rented.
The remaining S$140,400 was spent on actual restoration and maintenance work. This work involved the retention and restoration of original architectural features, including the main roof, original fan lights, windows, doors, vents, and other architectural elements that provide distinctive character to the building. Additional costs were incurred for tasks such as painting, pest control, and mold removal.
This implies that consultancy services accounted for a substantial 72% of the total renovation expenditure.
A similar trend was seen at 31 Ridout Road, where Dr Balakrishnan resides. Here, consultancy fees amounted to S$452,000 out of a total expenditure of S$570,500. The remaining S$118,500 was used for extensive renovations, including roof repairs and restoration of heritage features. Additionally, general repairs to the staircase, the perimeter of the house, fixing windows, and pest control were undertaken, along with unique tasks like snake climbing prevention. This indicates that nearly 79% of the total expenses were attributed to consultancy fees.
These figures from both properties, detailing a significant proportion of the expenses going towards consultancy fees rather than actual restoration work, resemble a case noted by the Auditor-General Office in its report for the Financial Year 2015/2016. The report stated that there had been an inadequate assessment of the reasonableness of a consultancy fee of S$410,000 quoted for the construction of a bin centre built by the National Arts Council (NAC) for the Victoria Theatre/Victoria Concert Hall (VT/VCH).
The AGO observed that the NAC had directly engaged the VT/VCH consultants to provide additional consultancy services amounting to S$410,000 for the construction of a bin center, without first conducting a cost assessment to ascertain the reasonableness of the fee quoted.
The AGO stated that the fee was exceptionally high at 87.2 per cent of the construction cost, S$470,000, and that there was no assurance that the fee paid by NAC was reasonable. The S$410,000 consultation fees, on top of the S$470,000 construction fees, meant that the bin center cost in total was a whopping S$880,000.
In the case of the 26 and 31 Ridout Road properties, the consultation fees were far greater proportion at 267% and 381% of the renovation costs respectively.
While the AGO conducted a selective audit on the SLA in FY2018/2019, it did not pick up this issue as it had in FY2015/2016 with the NAC bin centre. The AGO was headed by Ms Goh Soon Poh, who was newly appointed in February 2019 and has also been involved in another controversy, as she is the wife of Mr Heng Chee How, the Senior Minister of State for Defence.
Apparently, no one noticed these ratios during the parliamentary session, and the information slipped through the discussion while the Ministers and opposition were busy arguing over apparent conflicts of interest.
Head pain after seeing
Posts: 2,641
   
Threads: 424
    
Likes Received: 792 in 660 posts
Likes Given: 818
(04-07-2023, 12:17 AM)Sharexchange Wrote: Rich people problem...
is our money leh
Posts: 19,526
   
Threads: 2,622
    
Likes Received: 3,247 in 2,762 posts
Likes Given: 2,187
(04-07-2023, 12:33 AM)limpeh394 Wrote: is our money leh
On record, the Senior Minister who was previously in-charge of YOG2010 comes as no surprise..
"Exceeding the initial YOG budget by more than three times:
The budget has ballooned from $107 million dollars to a shocking $387 million dollars."
Posts: 3,446
   
Threads: 29
    
Likes Received: 1,225 in 1,005 posts
Likes Given: 1,006
(04-07-2023, 12:33 AM)limpeh394 Wrote: is our money leh
I am flabbergasted. This is only Consultancy Fees. Did SLA hire 100 PHD holders to walk around and evaluate the premises for 3 days?
Posts: 19,526
   
Threads: 2,622
    
Likes Received: 3,247 in 2,762 posts
Likes Given: 2,187
(04-07-2023, 08:23 AM)Wy:Nox Wrote: I am flabbergasted. This is only Consultancy Fees. Did SLA hire 100 PHD holders to walk around and evaluate the premises for 3 days?
Why SLA ceo didn't simply call JTC, HDB, and PWD ceo who are potentially real estate's experts?
Obviously, this shows SLA either lazy or knows very little or next to nothing..
Posts: 7,259
   
Threads: 244
    
Likes Received: 2,164 in 1,890 posts
Likes Given: 1,891
CPIB is Lee Hsien Loong, cannot xiasuay...
Posts: 2,275
   
Threads: 295
    
Likes Received: 713 in 574 posts
Likes Given: 3
(04-07-2023, 09:30 AM)ODA TETSURO Wrote: CPIB is Lee Hsien Loong, cannot xiasuay...
Then who should resign?
Posts: 4,656
   
Threads: 472
    
Likes Received: 1,796 in 1,494 posts
Likes Given: 111
what is the name of the consultancy company and who owns it?
Posts: 2,932
   
Threads: 477
    
Likes Received: 925 in 687 posts
Likes Given: 73
(04-07-2023, 01:43 PM)wendychan Wrote: what is the name of the consultancy company and who owns it?
31 ridout consultancy fees = 452k
26 ridout consultancy fees = 375k
Con+insult fees =79% of the total expenditure of actual renovation works.
Because two idiots who are so scared of snakes wanted to rent.
That's why SLA need to spend. Can someone check who are the experts that charged such fees?
(This post was last modified: 04-07-2023, 01:57 PM by
Obamao.)
Posts: 2,932
   
Threads: 477
    
Likes Received: 925 in 687 posts
Likes Given: 73
Posts: 3,446
   
Threads: 29
    
Likes Received: 1,225 in 1,005 posts
Likes Given: 1,006
(04-07-2023, 08:57 AM)Scythian Wrote: Why SLA ceo didn't simply call JTC, HDB, and PWD ceo who are potentially real estate's experts?
Obviously, this shows SLA either lazy or knows very little or next to nothing..
(04-07-2023, 01:43 PM)wendychan Wrote: what is the name of the consultancy company and who owns it?
That is also my question. What kind of Govt is SLA?
Posts: 2,932
   
Threads: 477
    
Likes Received: 925 in 687 posts
Likes Given: 73
Posts: 44,125
   
Threads: 31,817
    
Likes Received: 5,831 in 5,505 posts
Likes Given: 62,364
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)