Tharman sure yes man to PAP demands
I see as Cock Strong as a womanizer
I will vote tan kin lian or even a taxi driver as president
(19-08-2023, 03:10 PM)Ola Wrote: I would rather vote for a Taxi- driver than Tharman
(19-08-2023, 08:59 PM)sclim Wrote: ts, your header is a slender unless you can substiantiate it.
tan kin lian track record of leading a team of growing 600+ x over 30 years of that business entities, obviously shows he has some good business acumen. the way he was projected to be by some in the past may not show the true picture base on his track record.
he may gain lots more votes from voters unhappy with government related, ex civil servants
think about it.
(19-08-2023, 08:59 PM)sclim Wrote: ts, your header is a slender unless you can substiantiate it.
tan kin lian track record of leading a team of growing 600+ x over 30 years of that business entities, obviously shows he has some good business acumen. the way he was projected to be by some in the past may not show the true picture base on his track record.
he may gain lots more votes from voters unhappy with government related, ex civil servants
think about it.
(19-08-2023, 09:08 PM)TopSage Wrote: u never see that clown going around MRT telling everyone, "I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian "?
but never mind, no other independent candidate, i will vote for Tan la
(19-08-2023, 09:11 PM)TopSage Wrote: even got commuters so annoyed with his behavior, one even cut him off "I know u are tan kin lian" before he open his mouth
(19-08-2023, 09:26 PM)sclim Wrote: i also like tan. but i will vote for tharman.
the situations in singapore is quite bad. singapore try to be neutral in the usa/china fight.
we are just small tiny island both side also cannot offen.
but look at what happens to country that is not on us side. regime changed has happened in a few places.
we must always be on out guard.
if from president , pm, fm all chinese those with motive will say, look all chinese pro china.
so if president is indian, then at least top can talk to india and many us mnc that is chair or ceo indian, even uk current pm is indian. so that image wise we can be seen more neutral. by the way, my view is china is not the problem, neither is usa. it is those people who has an interest in making war to keep producing problems and using their influence to make others agree.
being neutral is not easy and in a very difficult positions. many neutral got hit along the way.
(19-08-2023, 09:26 PM)sclim Wrote: i also like tan. but i will vote for tharman.
the situations in singapore is quite bad. singapore try to be neutral in the usa/china fight.
we are just small tiny island both side also cannot offen.
but look at what happens to country that is not on us side. regime changed has happened in a few places.
we must always be on out guard.
if from president , pm, fm all chinese those with motive will say, look all chinese pro china.
so if president is indian, then at least top can talk to india and many us mnc that is chair or ceo indian, even uk current pm is indian. so that image wise we can be seen more neutral. by the way, my view is china is not the problem, neither is usa. it is those people who has an interest in making war to keep producing problems and using their influence to make others agree.
being neutral is not easy and in a very difficult positions. many neutral got hit along the way.
(19-08-2023, 09:08 PM)TopSage Wrote: u never see that clown going around MRT telling everyone, "I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian I'm Tan Kin Lian "?So troublesome just hang a signboard with his name n purpose and stand still at mrt station
but never mind, no other independent candidate, i will vote for Tan la
(19-08-2023, 09:26 PM)sclim Wrote: i also like tan. but i will vote for tharman.Don't forget that we already have 3 Indian presidents in the past. And we have an Indian fm for many many years, past and present.
the situations in singapore is quite bad. singapore try to be neutral in the usa/china fight.
we are just small tiny island both side also cannot offen.
but look at what happens to country that is not on us side. regime changed has happened in a few places.
we must always be on out guard.
if from president , pm, fm all chinese those with motive will say, look all chinese pro china.
so if president is indian, then at least top can talk to india and many us mnc that is chair or ceo indian, even uk current pm is indian. so that image wise we can be seen more neutral. by the way, my view is china is not the problem, neither is usa. it is those people who has an interest in making war to keep producing problems and using their influence to make others agree.
being neutral is not easy and in a very difficult positions. many neutral got hit along the way.