[RichDad]

Yes, vaccinated more likely to kena. But unvaccinated if kena more serious.  So how?

So why vaccinate? I think ST is going to say it is an error. Should be the other way around.

If kenna, then prepared for the worst. Its their choice. Dying from introducing vaccine into yr body which cld potentially caused severed side effects and possibly death or from catching the virus. Which has a higher risk? 

It was reported that half of Singapore population are fully vaccinated. 200,000 of elderly above 60 yrs are not vaccinated. 81of these elderly are infected. Out of these 81 elders, 69 are vaccinated and 12 are unvaccinated. What does it show? Vaccination does not staved the virus away. It shows more vaccinated people caught the virus than the unvaccinated. Why? Because they thought they are save as they are fully vaccinated. 

The unvaccinated are more responsible looking at the nos infected - only 12. So don't blame it on the unvaccinated for the spread of the Virus.

I think there are 700k seniors vaccinated vs 200k unvaccinated. So if we use the formula Pfizer used for its trial, then it is zero or negative efficacy? But it is not so simple because of the variables.

Bottom line is vaccine protects  you from serious illness but has short term side effects and even potential long term side effects for mRNA.

That's why I chose Sinovac for the protection from serious illness + lesser or zero side effects, both short and long term. 

The other option is to not vaccinate but if kena, then pray for the best.