07-05-2022, 01:43 AM
(06-05-2022, 09:37 AM)Hfourhappy Wrote: Did he really Un-intentionally omit the NOT??
I dont think so and i think it is intentionally omit the NOT.
And then cried foul when pBan.
This is what i called him : Le-siao-Kia, Kwa-lan-kia
The fact of the matter is, Schroder said it was a typo. I read somewhere that he admitted he was prone to making typographical errors 'lately' and was showing signs of age. Now we all make mistakes at times, and if we do not check or can't be bothered to check our spelling and grammar, those mistakes will be glaringly obvious for all to see.
You think it was deliberate, but for my part, I think the glaring omission of NOT was unintentional. When I consider that he was a serious forummer not given to pulling pranks, the probability of him intentionally leaving "not" out of his sensational headline is practically nil. It's no laughing matter blowing a head honcho's pay check out of all proportion either in jest or to sensationalize their fat cheque.
It's a conduct unbecoming to a serious and sensible poster. When you play such a prank, not only will your joke go down like a lead balloon, people won't take you seriously anymore. Schroder wasn't so stupid to do that.
To me he would be the most unlikely person to besmirch Ho Ching because, as previously mentioned, he was fiercely partisan, supporting the governing party all along. He was so supportive of the incumbent govt that I couldn't help but wonder sometimes whether he was part of the Internet brigade deployed to combat negative perceptions of the ruling party and its policies.