Portal
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Search
Member List
Help
Calendar
Login
Register
Hello There, Guest!
Login
Username/Email:
Password:
Lost Password?
Remember me
SG Talk
SG Talk
Market Talk
Linear Mode
Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
Alice Alicia
Supreme Guru
Reputation:
536
Posts: 6,854     Threads: 9     
Likes Received:
2,448
in 1,911 posts
Likes Given: 932
#3
28-09-2021, 11:01 AM
as usual, pap twisting the facts to suit their own agenda, not for the people.
in their own words, "not unexpected."
•
Find
Reply
«
Next Oldest
|
Next Newest
»
Messages In This Thread
Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
forum456
- 28-09-2021, 10:52 AM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
singaporean1964
- 28-09-2021, 10:56 AM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Gemstar
- 28-09-2021, 12:54 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Alice Alicia
- 28-09-2021, 11:01 AM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
starbugs
- 28-09-2021, 01:09 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Bigbluedot
- 28-09-2021, 02:11 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
A2Z
- 28-09-2021, 01:13 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Bigbluedot
- 28-09-2021, 01:56 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Hfourhappy
- 28-09-2021, 02:00 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Gemstar
- 28-09-2021, 08:31 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
debono
- 28-09-2021, 09:05 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Bigbluedot
- 28-09-2021, 02:04 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
watchfirst9
- 28-09-2021, 08:32 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Bigbluedot
- 28-09-2021, 10:02 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
debono
- 28-09-2021, 10:05 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
p1acebo
- 28-09-2021, 10:32 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Migrant
- 28-09-2021, 03:41 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Tangsen
- 28-09-2021, 08:05 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
p1acebo
- 28-09-2021, 08:40 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Tangsen
- 28-09-2021, 10:54 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Gemstar
- 28-09-2021, 11:15 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Tangsen
- 28-09-2021, 11:38 PM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Goldmine
- 29-09-2021, 01:16 AM
RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'
- by
Migrant
- 29-09-2021, 09:04 AM
View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:
Private Messages
User Control Panel
Who's Online
Search
Forum Home
SG Talk
-- Market Talk
-- Business News
-- Travel Talk
-- Hobbies Sharing
-- True Stories - strange, mysterious, unexplained
-- DISCLAIMER & PRIVACY POLICY
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
SG Talk
SG Talk
Market Talk