Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'

Linear Mode

Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'

Gemstar

Supreme Guru
Reputation: 171

Posts: 4,657 Threads: 8
Likes Received: 1,926 in 1,473 posts
Likes Given: 5,763

#13

28-09-2021, 08:31 PM

(28-09-2021, 02:00 PM)Hfourhappy Wrote: aiya, all those terms not important lah.
what matter most is whether you can walk, can eat , can do things on your own.

As long as one is healthy, young in mind and heart, and that he is capable of doing many things, he is not considered old even he has reach a certain age.

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by forum456 - 28-09-2021, 10:52 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by singaporean1964 - 28-09-2021, 10:56 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Gemstar - 28-09-2021, 12:54 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Alice Alicia - 28-09-2021, 11:01 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by starbugs - 28-09-2021, 01:09 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 02:11 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by A2Z - 28-09-2021, 01:13 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 01:56 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Hfourhappy - 28-09-2021, 02:00 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Gemstar - 28-09-2021, 08:31 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by debono - 28-09-2021, 09:05 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 02:04 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by watchfirst9 - 28-09-2021, 08:32 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 10:02 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by debono - 28-09-2021, 10:05 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by p1acebo - 28-09-2021, 10:32 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Migrant - 28-09-2021, 03:41 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Tangsen - 28-09-2021, 08:05 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by p1acebo - 28-09-2021, 08:40 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Tangsen - 28-09-2021, 10:54 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Gemstar - 28-09-2021, 11:15 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Tangsen - 28-09-2021, 11:38 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Goldmine - 29-09-2021, 01:16 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Migrant - 29-09-2021, 09:04 AM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)