Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'

Bigbluedot

Guru
Reputation: 27

Posts: 1,719 Threads: 127
Likes Received: 406 in 343 posts
Likes Given: 31

#17

28-09-2021, 10:02 PM

(28-09-2021, 08:32 PM)watchfirst9 Wrote: LKY is no longer PM by 67 years old.

76 years old and above can be called advanced age.

SingStat 65 to 74 as "young-old" is a joke, more appropriate range for "young-old" should be 61 to 69

i think hoh, 65 to 74 as "young-old" is coz they want you to work longer. so rely less on cpf.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by forum456 - 28-09-2021, 10:52 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by singaporean1964 - 28-09-2021, 10:56 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Gemstar - 28-09-2021, 12:54 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Alice Alicia - 28-09-2021, 11:01 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by starbugs - 28-09-2021, 01:09 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 02:11 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by A2Z - 28-09-2021, 01:13 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 01:56 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Hfourhappy - 28-09-2021, 02:00 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Gemstar - 28-09-2021, 08:31 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by debono - 28-09-2021, 09:05 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 02:04 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by watchfirst9 - 28-09-2021, 08:32 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 10:02 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by debono - 28-09-2021, 10:05 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by p1acebo - 28-09-2021, 10:32 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Migrant - 28-09-2021, 03:41 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Tangsen - 28-09-2021, 08:05 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by p1acebo - 28-09-2021, 08:40 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Tangsen - 28-09-2021, 10:54 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Gemstar - 28-09-2021, 11:15 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Tangsen - 28-09-2021, 11:38 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Goldmine - 29-09-2021, 01:16 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Migrant - 29-09-2021, 09:04 AM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Login
Username/Email:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me