Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'

Linear Mode

Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age'

Gemstar

Supreme Guru
Reputation: 171

Posts: 4,657 Threads: 8
Likes Received: 1,926 in 1,473 posts
Likes Given: 5,763

#21

28-09-2021, 11:15 PM

(28-09-2021, 10:54 PM)Tangsen Wrote: Once you hit 50 ... you can drop dead of age related illness.
These people wanna term what advanced age, young-old are old fuggers unable to accept they are OLD thus feeling insecure then come out with all these nonesene.
Nothing wrong to be old unless you yourself felt it is wrong ... embrace aging lah
Dun end up with thoseinsecure lau hero tie ponytail when only have a few strains of hairs

Sometimes, I really want to laugh when seeing those elderlies tied ponytail and even wearing ear rings. Somemore, with coloured bronze hair. Is it they are formerly from musical bands, hair stylists or media artistes?

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by forum456 - 28-09-2021, 10:52 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by singaporean1964 - 28-09-2021, 10:56 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Gemstar - 28-09-2021, 12:54 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Alice Alicia - 28-09-2021, 11:01 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by starbugs - 28-09-2021, 01:09 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 02:11 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by A2Z - 28-09-2021, 01:13 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 01:56 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Hfourhappy - 28-09-2021, 02:00 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Gemstar - 28-09-2021, 08:31 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by debono - 28-09-2021, 09:05 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 02:04 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by watchfirst9 - 28-09-2021, 08:32 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Bigbluedot - 28-09-2021, 10:02 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by debono - 28-09-2021, 10:05 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by p1acebo - 28-09-2021, 10:32 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Migrant - 28-09-2021, 03:41 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Tangsen - 28-09-2021, 08:05 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by p1acebo - 28-09-2021, 08:40 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Tangsen - 28-09-2021, 10:54 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Gemstar - 28-09-2021, 11:15 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Tangsen - 28-09-2021, 11:38 PM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Goldmine - 29-09-2021, 01:16 AM

RE: Forum: 71-year-old should not be described as being of 'advanced age' - by Migrant - 29-09-2021, 09:04 AM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)