[Bic_cherry]

clarify in court of law is considered harrass?

in singapore, if u win suit, the loser pay

Re:
https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/threa...-146585950



[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/s/2023_SGHC_54[/URL]

Judge didn't grant costs to plaintiff (Herbalife), means after all the harassment and nuisance that IRAS caused, Herbalife still have to pay their own lawyers and IRAS will continue to just suka suka fly test balloon to any old how issue notice of assessment to try to gain more tax revenue for gahmen.


Really should sack the IRAS CEO from his job, and ask IRAS to compensate Herbalife legal costs.

Then the law enforcers will learn to behave themselves.

Otherwise, they become hired hitmen or the greatest political mafias and gangsters, this land has and will last see.

IRAS should have negotiated with Herbalife or even sponsored Herbalife appeal to court, since IRAS themselves also not sure of how the law works. Now Herbalife won the appeal, IRAS should in gratitude, sponsor Herbalife lawyers and not pretend that they are angels when actually IRAS are rogues.

Probably for any appeal against government policy, if hearing granted by registrar or judge, the court hearing should be fully government sponsored as well.