[ArielCasper]

Last year May 2020 in the Dorm FW oral spray study of 3000 workers, only one dose of 12mg of Ivermectin was given to the participants over the 6 weeks duration whereas for other ingredients, dose per week for 6 weeks was given. The result did not show that Ivermectin was a dangerous drug as claimed by HSA. In fact, Prof Tambaya said in an audio interview (I hv the audio recording) that Ivermectin was a very safe drug & the results were pretty good based on just 1 dose. Did any of the 3000 FW suffer any nasty side-effects using one dose of Ivermectin? According to ST Clara Chong & HSA, they should hv suffered badly due to Ivermectin's nasty side-effects. But, no. Instead, they chose the hydroxycholoquine & povidone-iodine sprays saying they performed the best which is flawed. Ivermectin is a very safe & effective drug against SARS-COV-2. But their study was clearly biased against it.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056783/

Great.. Learnt something new from you today.. I didn't hear anyone talking about a test was actually conducted in Singapore dorm...

Now, the conclusion from the report is,

Chemoprophylaxis with either oral hydroxychloroquine or povidone-iodine throat spray was superior to oral vitamin C in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection in young and healthy men.

Also, this is the result which lead to the conclusion..

A total of 3037 asymptomatic participants (mean age, 33.0 years; all men) who were seronegative to SARS-CoV-2 at baseline were included in the primary analysis. Follow-up was nearly complete (99.6%). Compared with vitamin C, significant absolute risk reductions (%, 98.75% confidence interval) were observed for oral hydroxychloroquine (21%, 2–42%) and povidone-iodine throat spray (24%, 7–39%). No statistically significant differences were observed with oral zinc/vitamin C combination (23%, –5 to +41%) and ivermectin (5%, –10 to +22%).