Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP:

Linear Mode

Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP:

Bigiron

Supreme Guru
Reputation: 457

Posts: 55,176 Threads: 40,688
Likes Received: 6,460 in 6,068 posts
Likes Given: 69,058

#5

20-08-2023, 08:39 AM

(20-08-2023, 08:18 AM)Sticw Wrote: Tharman quietly let Ng wear out TKL. TKL instead has to compete against Ng and Tharman. 2 fight 1. 45 years of gic investment so when need to draw down reserves to patch past bad decisions, isn't that own self check own self? Lol

Just vote for TKL lah.
When the govt is busy and occupied, the people get a chance to breath and live.

yup you are right vote TKL to use mouth to channel feedback to get his $1.5m PA SHIOK SHIOK can make HDB afforadable & lower the cost of living also

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 08:11 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Sticw - 20-08-2023, 08:18 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 08:39 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by p1acebo - 20-08-2023, 08:22 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by FangFang - 20-08-2023, 08:32 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 08:43 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Scythian - 20-08-2023, 09:05 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Lukongsimi - 20-08-2023, 10:18 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Lukongsimi - 20-08-2023, 10:42 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Sticw - 20-08-2023, 10:48 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Lukongsimi - 20-08-2023, 10:59 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Clyde - 20-08-2023, 11:04 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by watchfirst9 - 20-08-2023, 12:02 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Lukongsimi - 20-08-2023, 11:07 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Ola - 20-08-2023, 12:11 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 12:13 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by limpeh394 - 20-08-2023, 11:16 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 12:05 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by starbugs - 20-08-2023, 11:26 AM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 12:08 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by KILLjoy - 20-08-2023, 12:19 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Clyde - 20-08-2023, 12:26 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 02:09 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Sticw - 20-08-2023, 12:34 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by RichDad - 20-08-2023, 02:04 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 02:11 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Instinct - 20-08-2023, 02:54 PM

RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Ola - 20-08-2023, 04:55 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)