20-08-2023, 11:07 AM
https://www.facebook.com/reel/6605611589494335?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&mibextid=0NULKw
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
![](https://i.imgur.com/CLvY2jA.png")
Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP:
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 08:11 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Sticw - 20-08-2023, 08:18 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 08:39 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by p1acebo - 20-08-2023, 08:22 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by FangFang - 20-08-2023, 08:32 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 08:43 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Scythian - 20-08-2023, 09:05 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Lukongsimi - 20-08-2023, 10:18 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Lukongsimi - 20-08-2023, 10:42 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Sticw - 20-08-2023, 10:48 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Lukongsimi - 20-08-2023, 10:59 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Clyde - 20-08-2023, 11:04 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by watchfirst9 - 20-08-2023, 12:02 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Lukongsimi - 20-08-2023, 11:07 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Ola - 20-08-2023, 12:11 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 12:13 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by limpeh394 - 20-08-2023, 11:16 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 12:05 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by starbugs - 20-08-2023, 11:26 AM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 12:08 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by KILLjoy - 20-08-2023, 12:19 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Clyde - 20-08-2023, 12:26 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 02:09 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Sticw - 20-08-2023, 12:34 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by RichDad - 20-08-2023, 02:04 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Bigiron - 20-08-2023, 02:11 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Instinct - 20-08-2023, 02:54 PM
RE: Tharman a 'formidable opponent', but President should not have belonged to the PAP: - by Ola - 20-08-2023, 04:55 PM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
