[watchfirst9]

I don't understand why forum members always said bad/negative things about mRNA, but praise Sinovac and Sinopham vaccines, and all the positive things about this vaccine, I wonder if there is any hidden agenda behind all this...

You must learn to listen opposition view 
mRNA vaccine is not performing up to the media or Govt hype.

inactivated vaccine lower efficacy is compensate by less implications
and as explained valneva
https://theconversation.com/whats-the-va...oof-160345
What are the benefits we know so far?

This approach to vaccine development presents the immune system with all of the structural components of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, not just the spike protein, as many other COVID-19 vaccines do.
So Valneva’s vaccine is thought to produce a more broadly protective immune response. That is, antibodies and cells of the immune system are able to recognise and neutralise more pieces of the virus than just the spike protein.
As a result, Valneva’s vaccine could be more effective at tackling emerging COVID-19 virus variants and, if approved, play a useful role as a booster vaccine.

it is likely cover mutations better.

Hence all types of vaccine should be allowed in as long it proven working.


If jab mRNA jab vaccine is so well, why Pfizer switch working  pill type which is non mRNA of course.
FYI mRNA can also be be nasal intake. 

PLP also must got some standard.