A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed
#22

(22-02-2024, 10:30 AM)EvertonDiehard Wrote:  In S'pore, if one is still unemployed 6 months after being laid off, he is considered retired or no longer interested in re-joining the workforce. We know that a PME older than 45 years of age may take up to 2 or more years to land another job that is comparable to the one he lost, so 6 months is far too short a time period to label someone as no longer interested in looking for a job, and remove him from the list of unemployed. 

In Singapore, a person is counted as unemployed if he or she is

(i) not working during the survey reference week, but is
(ii) actively looking for a job in the last 4 weeks, and
(iii) available for work in the next 2 weeks.

This includes persons who are not working but are taking steps to start their own business or
taking up a new job after the reference week.

@https://stats.mom.gov.sg/iMAS_PdfLibrary/mrsd_qtlmr173_Technical_Note.pdf
(Remove the '@' from the above link to get MOM's document)

There is only this 4-week rule about 'actively looking for a job'. Nothing about 6 months. Any link to this 6-month rule you mentioned?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by EvertonDiehard - 21-02-2024, 10:41 PM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by Blasterlord2 - 21-02-2024, 11:20 PM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by Scythian - 22-02-2024, 12:13 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by EvertonDiehard - 22-02-2024, 08:55 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by victortan - 22-02-2024, 12:03 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by Scythian - 22-02-2024, 12:21 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by EvertonDiehard - 22-02-2024, 08:51 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by EvertonDiehard - 22-02-2024, 08:46 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by Scythian - 22-02-2024, 12:26 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by grotesqueness - 22-02-2024, 12:41 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by Ola - 22-02-2024, 08:21 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by EvertonDiehard - 22-02-2024, 08:49 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by Ola - 22-02-2024, 09:02 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by EvertonDiehard - 22-02-2024, 09:08 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by RiseofAsia - 22-02-2024, 09:49 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by forum456 - 22-02-2024, 09:35 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by EvertonDiehard - 22-02-2024, 09:41 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by forum456 - 22-02-2024, 10:17 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by Levin - 22-02-2024, 09:51 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by EvertonDiehard - 22-02-2024, 10:30 AM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by Levin - 22-02-2024, 12:08 PM
RE: A more accurate measure of unemployment rate needed - by RiseofAsia - 22-02-2024, 09:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)