[luncheonmeat]

And I said I am not using the term Jews. I'm using the term children of Israel. The children of Israel were God's chosen people, not the Jews of today. The Jews of today rejected Jesus as their king and they are expecting the announcement of their king very soon, which I can tell you is not going to be Jesus. He will be the imposter, the false messiah.

Do you think the Jews in Israel now are the descendants of Prophet Jacob, pbuh? Surely not.

I've also given you my reason why I said Jesus doesn't belong to the children of Israel because he doesn't have a father as the lineage of Israel is from the father, not mother as some Jews would like you to think.

Do you really think the Jews in Israel today are God's chosen people? I will argue on that later.

Lastly, you already know there are forgeries in the NT. How are you now so sure which verses are genuine? What if that part in John would not in future be taken out of the Bible because scholars have found evidence it was forged?

Even if you invalidate the whole gospel from St John,that still doesn't disqualify the secular statement that salvation comes from the Jews and Jesus is a Jew. The Torah was written by the Jews for the Jews who were/are children of Israel. The term 'Jew' has a history longer than 'Christian'. 'Catholic' and 'Moslem'.  Even if you discount  Jesus'  partrilineage he is still all Jew based on his DNA from his mother and we are talking about Jews as a race here.
For reptiles which self-replicated without males [google please], does that make them non-reptiles?

Your whole argument holds no water at any which angle. Readers can decide for themselves.