[Bigiron]

无人驾驶车辆可克服难请到巴士司机的问题，我国准备在未来五年，加快和加大这类车辆的使用，为组屋区居民提供更多选项，也缩短头尾一里路的路程。

https://zb.sg/Kswn

[sclim]

autonomous vehicle on a fix route is easier to implement.
so if only within bus lane. other vehicle don't come in disturb easier. but must look out for cyclist. these are now in no control zone. no license needed. so suka suka.
some more some think they are king other must give ways.

in a controlled enviorment like within a control space even easier. like port limit. military zone.

[forum456]

talk cock sing song only.

PAP talked about this 10 years ago and nothing happened.
In fact, all trials with LTA failed and the companies stopped the trials.

[RiseofAsia]

talk cock sing song only.

PAP talked about this 10 years ago and nothing happened.
In fact, all trials with LTA failed and the companies stopped the trials.

在画大饼lah.
好大喜功。

Bus drivers are going to lose jobs soon.

[babygirl]

[freedom]

He is hinting that, 5 years from now, those who still can't afford a private car, will risk their cheap life in a driveless bus, and leave things to their fate. He is laughing at you because he can well afford a private car, but not the mass.

[kopihothot]

Autonomous vehicles will only get better & safer, even safer than human drivers, in double quick time especially with AI. Now the technology already matures till even the government "dare" to use them on public roads.

All those who complain taxi-drivers and other driving jobs are lousy jobs that can only bring in 4k-6k per month with basically no requirement other than you being able to get a driving license, well, they are winning.

These drivers, especially those with no other skill or qualification can soon retire and enjoy life.

[Bigiron]

### Potential Flaws
1. **Lack of Empirical Evidence for Claims**:
   - The article likely claims that AVs will alleviate driver shortages and improve travel experiences within five years, but it may not provide specific data to support this timeline. For instance, it might not cite current driver shortage figures (e.g., the number of unfilled bus or taxi driver positions) or results from AV trials in Singapore, such as those in Punggol or Jurong. Without such evidence, the feasibility of the five-year goal remains speculative.
   - **Example from context**: Siow’s statement about expecting “many” AVs in five years is optimistic, but no specific trial outcomes or deployment milestones are detailed in related reports.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...five-years)

2. **Over-Optimistic Timeline**:
   - The five-year timeline for widespread AV deployment may be overly ambitious, given global challenges in achieving Level 4–5 autonomy (fully autonomous driving). Technical hurdles (e.g., sensor reliability in dense urban settings), regulatory delays, and public acceptance issues could impede progress. The article might not acknowledge these risks, presenting an overly rosy picture.
   - **Example from context**: Siow’s predecessor, Chee Hong Tat, emphasized safety as a priority for AV deployment, suggesting a cautious approach that may conflict with an aggressive timeline.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...ow-5179861)

3. **Limited Stakeholder Perspectives**:
   - The article may heavily rely on Siow’s perspective as Acting Transport Minister, potentially reflecting a government-centric narrative aligned with Singapore’s Smart Nation initiative. It might lack input from other stakeholders, such as bus drivers, taxi drivers, transport unions, or commuters, who could raise concerns about job losses or safety risks associated with AVs.
   - **Example from context**: Siow’s focus on AVs as a solution to driver shortages does not address potential job displacement, a concern not covered in related reports.[](https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapo...five-years)

4. **Failure to Address Socioeconomic Impacts**:
   - The article might not discuss the socioeconomic consequences of AV deployment, such as job losses for drivers or the cost of transitioning to AV infrastructure (e.g., upgrading roads or installing 5G networks). This omission could skew the narrative toward benefits without acknowledging trade-offs.
   - **Example from context**: While Siow highlights AVs as a “game-changer” for public transport, there’s no mention of retraining programs for affected drivers, unlike Chee Hong Tat’s discussion of training for new transport jobs.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor.../121340292)

5. **Potential Bias in Reporting**:
   - As a major Singaporean outlet, Lianhe Zaobao may align with government narratives, especially on high-profile initiatives like AVs. This could lead to uncritical reporting of Siow’s claims without questioning the feasibility or exploring alternative solutions to driver shortages (e.g., increasing driver wages or improving working conditions).
   - **Question to consider**: Does the article challenge Siow’s assertions or include critical voices?

### Potential Ambiguities
1. **Vague Definition of “Driver Shortage”**:
   - The term “driver shortage” might be used without specifying its scope. For example, it may not clarify whether it refers to bus drivers, taxi drivers, private-hire drivers, or delivery drivers, nor provide data on the extent of the shortage (e.g., vacancy rates). This lack of clarity makes it hard to assess the problem’s severity.
   - **Example from context**: Siow notes that AVs can address the shortage of bus drivers, but no specific figures are provided in related reports to quantify this issue.[](https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapo...five-years)

2. **Unclear Scope of “Autonomous Vehicles”**:
   - The term “unmanned vehicles” (无人车) could be ambiguous, potentially encompassing fully autonomous vehicles (Level 4–5), semi-autonomous systems (Level 2–3), or short-range shuttles. The article might not specify which type is targeted, leading to uncertainty about the scale of deployment.
   - **Example from context**: Siow mentions AVs for “short shuttle services” to community centers or transport nodes, but it’s unclear if the five-year plan includes broader applications like robo-taxis or autonomous buses on public routes.[](https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/t...ling-times)

3. **Ambiguity Around “Improved Travel Experience”**:
   - The claim of enhancing the “travel experience” may lack detail on how AVs will achieve this. For instance, it might not specify whether improvements involve reduced fares, shorter travel times, or increased safety, leaving readers unclear about the tangible benefits.
   - **Example from context**: Siow aims to make public transport journeys competitive with private cars, but the article may not explain how AVs will reduce travel times or costs compared to existing services.[](https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/t...ling-times)

4. **Lack of Implementation Details**:
   - The article might not clarify how AVs will be deployed (e.g., pilot programs, city-wide rollout, or specific areas like Tengah) or what infrastructure is needed (e.g., smart traffic systems, charging stations). It may also be vague about whether AVs will primarily serve public transport (e.g., buses) or private-hire services.
   - **Example from context**: The Land Transport Authority’s call for proposals to trial autonomous buses from mid-2026 suggests a phased approach, but the article may not detail specific routes or timelines.[](https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/t...rt-network)

5. **Unclear Regulatory Framework**:
   - The article might not address the regulatory steps needed for AV deployment, such as safety standards, liability rules, or public consultation processes. This omission could create uncertainty about the practical path to achieving Siow’s vision.
   - **Example from context**: Siow’s confidence in seeing “many” AVs in five years lacks mention of regulatory hurdles, which his predecessor noted as critical.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...ow-5179861)

### Contextual Analysis
Based on related web results:
- **Driver Shortages**: Singapore’s public transport sector faces ongoing driver shortages, particularly for buses, as noted in Siow’s comments about AVs addressing this issue. However, no precise data on vacancy rates is provided in the sources.[](https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapo...five-years)
- **AV Progress**: Singapore has been testing AVs since 2013, with trials in controlled areas. The Land Transport Authority’s recent call for autonomous bus trials by mid-2026 indicates progress, but scaling to widespread deployment by 2030 remains challenging.[](https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...rt-network)
- **Siow’s Priorities**: Siow emphasizes reducing public transport travel times and making them competitive with private cars, with AVs as a key strategy. However, his focus on short shuttle services suggests a limited initial scope rather than full city-wide adoption.[](https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/t...ling-times)
- **Potential Bias**: Lianhe Zaobao, as a state-aligned outlet, may prioritize positive framing of government initiatives, potentially overlooking critical perspectives like job displacement or public skepticism about AV safety.

### Recommendations for Critical Reading
To evaluate the article:
1. **Verify Data**: Check for specific figures on driver shortages or AV trial outcomes to assess the feasibility of Siow’s claims.
2. **Seek Diverse Voices**: Look for input from drivers, unions, or commuters to balance Siow’s perspective.
3. **Clarify Terms**: Ensure terms like “unmanned vehicles” and “travel experience” are defined with concrete examples or metrics.
4. **Cross-Check Timeline**: Compare the five-year goal with global AV deployment timelines (e.g., Waymo or Cruise in the U.S.) to gauge realism.
5. **Assess Trade-Offs**: Look for discussion of job losses, infrastructure costs, or safety risks to ensure a balanced narrative.

If you can share specific excerpts or claims from the article, I can provide a more targeted analysis of its flaws and ambiguities. Alternatively, I can search for additional context or analyze related X posts for public sentiment. Would you like me to proceed with either option?

[Blasterlord2]

Just a matter of time this will happen. In some parts of China it's already quite common.

[bobby]