https://_bannedsite_full_of_defamatory_c...d_id=97104
19 WOMEN ARRESTED AT GEYLANG FOR KKJ SERVICES
18-03-2023, 10:13 AM
19 WOMEN ARRESTED AT GEYLANG FOR KKJ SERVICES, HAPPY ENDING BECOME SAD ENDING
https://_bannedsite_full_of_defamatory_c...d_id=97104
https://_bannedsite_full_of_defamatory_c...d_id=97104
18-03-2023, 11:39 AM
18-03-2023, 12:58 PM
The thing about such raid is... Why sugar daddy and babe, social escorts etc all glorified but cheap end massage and ktv kena?? Lol
18-03-2023, 01:03 PM
18-03-2023, 01:48 PM
(18-03-2023, 01:03 PM)winbig Wrote: Maybe cos sugar daddy are usually rich and may be powerful?
That is so true. These group of ppl must give a bit of face can be judge doctor lecturer director etc. So catch the normal group ppl instead.
It is like workplace shit happen the low rank kena always. High rank take longer as need even higher rank to investigate properly etc. Which is why working ppl say your rank must be higher the better.
18-03-2023, 01:59 PM
Someone in this forum stole my kkj to provide services
He should be ashamed of himself
He should be ashamed of himself
18-03-2023, 02:08 PM
we know being cheekon is NOT illegal but UNLICENSED OKT is illegal so what charges these cheekon would be deal with exactly ??
both these law mentioned in news seem to target OKT only.
>Under the Women’s Charter 1961, any person who, in the course of business, uses a remote communication service with a Singapore link to offer or facilitate the provision by a woman or girl to another person of explicit services in Singapore in return for payment or reward, shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $100,000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both. Where the person is a repeat offender, he will be liable on conviction, to a fine not exceeding $150,000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years, or bot
>Under the same Act, any person who knowingly lives wholly or in part on the earnings of the prostitution of a woman or girl shall be guilty of an offence and shall be punished on conviction with imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years and shall also be liable to a fine not exceeding $100,000. Where the person is a repeat offender, he shall be liable on conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years and shall also be liable to a fine not exceeding $150,000.
both these law mentioned in news seem to target OKT only.
>Under the Women’s Charter 1961, any person who, in the course of business, uses a remote communication service with a Singapore link to offer or facilitate the provision by a woman or girl to another person of explicit services in Singapore in return for payment or reward, shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $100,000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both. Where the person is a repeat offender, he will be liable on conviction, to a fine not exceeding $150,000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years, or bot
>Under the same Act, any person who knowingly lives wholly or in part on the earnings of the prostitution of a woman or girl shall be guilty of an offence and shall be punished on conviction with imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years and shall also be liable to a fine not exceeding $100,000. Where the person is a repeat offender, he shall be liable on conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years and shall also be liable to a fine not exceeding $150,000.
18-03-2023, 02:49 PM
(18-03-2023, 02:08 PM)limpeh394 Wrote: we know being cheekon is NOT illegal but UNLICENSED OKT is illegal so what charges these cheekon would be deal with exactly ??
both these law mentioned in news seem to target OKT only.
>Under the Women’s Charter 1961, any person who, in the course of business, uses a remote communication service with a Singapore link to offer or facilitate the provision by a woman or girl to another person of explicit services in Singapore in return for payment or reward, shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $100,000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both. Where the person is a repeat offender, he will be liable on conviction, to a fine not exceeding $150,000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years, or bot
>Under the same Act, any person who knowingly lives wholly or in part on the earnings of the prostitution of a woman or girl shall be guilty of an offence and shall be punished on conviction with imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years and shall also be liable to a fine not exceeding $100,000. Where the person is a repeat offender, he shall be liable on conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years and shall also be liable to a fine not exceeding $150,000.
The law explicitly mention woman or girl. What if is guy? I saw video gay couple the male prostitute his other half also male to earn monies so will be exempted if caught?
18-03-2023, 04:06 PM
(18-03-2023, 12:58 PM)Sticw Wrote: The thing about such raid is... Why sugar daddy and babe, social escorts etc all glorified but cheap end massage and ktv kena?? Lol
Let me share my pov. Because the world and all vices were meant for the rich and powerful to enjoy. When the commoners mimic and get cheaper but still good deals, the elites cannot take it. They don't feel privileged when commoners get enjoyment. Hence, everything the masses do has to be in order and under control.
Some 2 legs are good... And the pigs look no different from the very humans the animals once chased out long ago...
18-03-2023, 04:07 PM
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)