Another good man PAP missed: Dr Paul Tambyah
#1

Caladium Lindenii
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRrj-iS9cNY

Erudite and soft spoken man. Vote him in. Why are jlbs like DisGracefool and Cougar Teo ministars while competent and civic minded men like Tambyah are viewed as threats.
[+] 2 users Like luncheonmeat's post
Reply
#2

Paul Tambyah is truthfully a good man with a kind heart. Very soft spoken and respectable and cannot compare with those pappies. Can easily beat any of those pappies flat. Deserved to be a minister.
[+] 1 user Likes Gemstar's post
Reply
#3

(21-04-2025, 09:39 PM)luncheonmeat Wrote:  Caladium Lindenii
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRrj-iS9cNY

Erudite and soft spoken man. Vote him in. Why are jlbs like DisGracefool and Cougar Teo ministars while competent and civic minded men like Tambyah are viewed as threats.


PAP is not a party - it's like a mafia family.................won't want good people.............or capable people ..................
[+] 3 users Like Napoleon Porlumpar's post
Reply
#4

Ruling party want people to say yes to all their decisions either good or bad policy which he may not agreed
Reply
#5

As a pap MP, because of the party whip, one will still have to support the party's decision even he/she disagrees with the bill or decision.

So you ask yourself, why would you want an MP who cannot say "NO" or objects to a bill or decision??
[+] 1 user Likes Nico's post
Reply
#6

(21-04-2025, 09:39 PM)luncheonmeat Wrote:  Caladium Lindenii
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRrj-iS9cNY

Erudite and soft spoken man. Vote him in. Why are jlbs like DisGracefool and Cougar Teo ministars while competent and civic minded men like Tambyah are viewed as threats.

Same as why countries like SK and Japan and Singapore, Australia, Philippines are allies of the US while China and Russia are viewed as threats to the US.

It’s all about who are your “yes men” and who are the people who can topple and replace you.

Same lah, like in the workplace also. Your boss will see anyone who is as capable as him as the largest threat to his existence.

.
Reply
#7

Who is he?
Reply
#8

Har?
I thought it was the Singaporean voted him out of Parliament..🤭🤣
Time after time, democratically..😊
Reply
#9

--------------------------
The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) is contesting Bukit Panjang SMC in the General Election (GE) 2025, scheduled for May 3, 2025. SDP’s chairman, Paul Tambyah, faces off against the People’s Action Party (PAP) incumbent, Liang Eng Hwa, in a rematch of their closely fought 2020 race. This analysis evaluates SDP’s chances of winning Bukit Panjang SMC under three voteshare scenarios, considering the 2020 election results, voter sentiment for greater parliamentary diversity, Tambyah’s strong performance in GE 2020, and his likelihood of defeating PAP.

Background and Context
In GE 2020, Bukit Panjang SMC was one of the most competitive races, with PAP’s Liang Eng Hwa securing 53.74% of the vote (18,070 votes) against SDP’s Paul Tambyah, who garnered 46.26% (15,556 votes), a narrow margin of 2,514 votes [Web ID: 0] [Web ID: 2] [Web ID: 16]. The constituency had 35,497 registered voters then, but for GE 2025, this has decreased to 33,566 due to unchanged boundaries [Web ID: 0] [Web ID: 1]. Tambyah’s 2020 performance marked SDP’s strongest showing in Bukit Panjang since the SMC’s creation in 2006, reflecting his appeal as an infectious diseases expert and a vocal critic of PAP policies, such as the handling of COVID-19 [Web ID: 2] [Web ID: 12].

Voter sentiment in 2025 leans toward greater diversity in parliament, as acknowledged by PM Lawrence Wong post-GE 2020, when he noted PAP is unlikely to exceed 65% voteshare due to this trend [Web ID: 16]. This sentiment is evident in Bukit Panjang, where residents have raised concerns about healthcare, caregiving support, and local issues like transport connectivity and crows during Tambyah’s recent engagements [Web ID: 14]. Tambyah’s campaign focuses on social policy, public health, and affordability, aligning with SDP’s broader platform of addressing living costs [Web ID: 14] [Web ID: 15]. Meanwhile, Liang, a four-term MP and DBS managing director, emphasizes continuity and local improvements, citing his recovery from the COVID-era challenges and initiatives like water security assessments [Web ID: 0] [Web ID: 1].

Factors Influencing SDP’s Chances
Tambyah’s 2020 Performance and Groundwork: Tambyah’s 46.26% in 2020 was a significant improvement over SDP’s previous results in Bukit Panjang (e.g., 31.62% in 2015) [Web ID: 2] [Web ID: 4]. His recent efforts, covering 135 of 150 HDB blocks and hosting dialogues like the “Ask Paul Anything” session at Pang Sua Pond, show strong community engagement [Web ID: 14] [Web ID: 22]. His background as a medical professor and SDP chairman adds credibility, especially on healthcare issues, a key resident concern [Web ID: 14].

Voter Desire for Diversity: The push for diversity, as noted by Wong, could benefit SDP, especially in a competitive SMC like Bukit Panjang, where opposition support has grown [Web ID: 16]. A YouGov survey suggests PAP support might drop to 40% nationally, with voter uncertainty signaling fluid ground that could favor opposition candidates like Tambyah [Web ID: 14].

PAP’s Challenges: Liang’s narrow 2020 win and his health struggles with nose cancer (diagnosed in 2023) might raise questions about his capacity, though he emphasizes his recovery and service [Web ID: 0]. PAP’s broader challenges, like rising living costs, could erode support, as SDP highlights government inaction on such issues [Web ID: 15].

Local Issues and Competition: Bukit Panjang residents have voiced concerns over lift upgrades, caregiving grants, and safety, which Tambyah addresses directly [Web ID: 14]. No other parties or independents have signaled interest in contesting Bukit Panjang, ensuring a straight fight that avoids vote splitting [Web ID: 0].

Three Voteshare Scenarios for GE 2025

Scenario 1: SDP Voteshare at 48–50% (Slight Improvement, PAP Wins)
Context: SDP improves marginally on its 2020 result (46.26%), gaining 48–50% of the vote, while PAP secures 50–52%. This reflects a cautious shift toward diversity but not enough to unseat Liang.
Factors: Tambyah’s groundwork and focus on healthcare resonate, but Liang’s incumbency and PAP’s organizational strength hold firm. The 6% drop in registered voters (from 35,497 to 33,566) might slightly favor PAP if turnout among older, PAP-leaning residents remains high [Web ID: 0] [Web ID: 1]. National PAP voteshare at 60–62% (as in the earlier analysis) limits opposition gains.
Outcome: SDP narrows the gap but loses by 1–2%. Tambyah’s stronger showing reinforces Bukit Panjang as a battleground, potentially earning him an NCMP seat if SDP doesn’t win elsewhere.

Scenario 2: SDP Voteshare at 51–53% (Moderate Gain, SDP Wins)
Context: SDP secures 51–53%, flipping the seat from PAP, which drops to 47–49%. This aligns with a national PAP voteshare of 55–58%, reflecting a stronger diversity push.
Factors: Tambyah capitalizes on resident frustration with delayed caregiving grants and living costs, issues SDP has prioritized [Web ID: 14] [Web ID: 15]. His engagement with 90% of HDB blocks builds trust, while Liang’s health concerns and perceived PAP disconnect (e.g., on cost-of-living measures) sway swing voters [Web ID: 0] [Web ID: 22]. The straight fight ensures no vote split, amplifying SDP’s gains [Web ID: 0].
Outcome: SDP wins Bukit Panjang SMC, marking Tambyah’s first elected MP role. This victory contributes to SDP’s broader gains (e.g., 2 SMCs in the earlier analysis) and signals a shift in voter sentiment.

Scenario 3: SDP Voteshare at 55–57% (Significant Surge, SDP Wins Decisively)
Context: SDP achieves 55–57%, with PAP dropping to 43–45%, reflecting a national PAP voteshare of 50–53% amid a major diversity wave.
Factors: A groundswell of support for opposition voices, as predicted by the YouGov survey (PAP at 40% nationally), boosts Tambyah significantly [Web ID: 14]. His healthcare expertise and SDP’s policy focus on affordability resonate strongly, while PAP faces backlash over economic discontent and governance fatigue. Liang’s inability to address systemic issues like rising costs erodes his support [Web ID: 15]. Tambyah’s extensive groundwork maximizes voter turnout in SDP’s favor [Web ID: 22].
Outcome: SDP wins decisively, giving Tambyah a strong mandate. This aligns with the earlier analysis’s high-opposition scenario, where SDP could secure additional seats like Sembawang West SMC and Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC.

Chances of Paul Tambyah Beating PAP
Tambyah has a credible shot at defeating PAP, given his 2020 performance and current conditions. In Scenario 1, his chances are slim (30–40%), as PAP’s incumbency holds. In Scenario 2, his odds rise to 60–70%, driven by a moderate diversity push and local frustrations. In Scenario 3, his chances peak at 80–90%, fueled by a national opposition surge. The straight fight, Tambyah’s groundwork, and voter desire for diversity tilt the odds in his favor compared to 2020, making Scenario 2 the most likely outcome, with a potential upset if national sentiment shifts further (Scenario 3).

Conclusion
SDP’s chances in Bukit Panjang SMC range from a narrow loss (48–50%) to a decisive win (55–57%), depending on the strength of the diversity wave and Tambyah’s ability to convert resident concerns into votes. Scenario 2 (51–53%) is the most plausible, giving Tambyah a strong chance to unseat Liang and secure SDP’s first Bukit Panjang win, aligning with broader opposition gains in GE 2025.
--------------------
Source: Grok AI using real-time data.
Reply
#10

Yup.
He is a good guy and a good doctor too.
Reply
#11

need some advice who ish SURE notch happy about this lololololol... Tongue

“Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth” – Buddha.
[Image: https://i.ibb.co/0hWSqby/wednesday-quote.jpg]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)