Citizens have a right of housing in their own country - Jamus Lim
#1

https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/other/pub...d=msedgdhp
[+] 4 users Like Everything Everywhere's post
Reply
#2

Ya....but sadly only for rich people who own private property only...

Confused
Reply
#3

Right way to go. Male citizens served 2 years of NS, should deserve more recognition for their national service.  
So one way is to provide cheaper housing for those who have served NS. Not for those who just become New citizens

Laughing
[+] 2 users Like Gstalk's post
Reply
#4

(18-04-2023, 11:23 AM)Gstalk Wrote:  Right way to go. Male citizens served 2 years of NS, should deserve more recognition for their national service.  
So one way is to provide cheaper housing for those who have served NS. Not for those who just become New citizens

Singaporean chabors do not do NS.  Should they be ENTITLED to cheaper housing if they buy as a single?
Reply
#5

(18-04-2023, 11:22 AM)ODA TETSURO Wrote:  Ya....but sadly only for rich people who own private property only...

The rich does not need government help anyway.  And more and more Chinese are emigrating to Singapore and buying up private properties.

As for locals, what Jamus Lim is doing is precisely what Lawrence Wong said: dancing to the gallery.  Talk only but no alternative solution offered.

Offer solutions manz.  Not just stand up in Parliament, and say: I want this!  I want that!  

Yeah, doing that will be seen as "speaking up for the man in the street aka oppies".

Who does not know how to do that?

Same for Gerald Giam...asking for a bigger NS allowance for army boys.  That's called "The Oppo MPs are speaking up for the peepur!"  Ranjiao lar.

Curry nah!  Even my grandmother knows how to do that manz.  

You pay the oppo MPs $16K a month just to stand up and ask for this and that?
Reply
#6

took land away from peasants, farmers, barren for decades then put up for land tender sales to build condos. should give back via cheaper housing to our citizens.
Reply
#7

(18-04-2023, 11:17 AM)Everything Everywhere At Once Wrote:  https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/other/pub...d=msedgdhp



Really good idea from Jamus.

Why PnP MPs never thought about it?.


WTF
[+] 2 users Like Stoki's post
Reply
#8

Jamus wants to let the homeless Singaporeans have a right to own housing in the Singapore OR he wants a discount for those who can afford housing but just wanted something better?

"A right to housing in their own country" sounds like trying to fight for the homeless to have a home instead of getting discounts.

Anyway, I am ok with his suggestion on coming up with a different way to infer value of land that is hopefully better. But be prepared for the chasm between private housing and public housing to widen much further so that it becomes more difficult to upgrade to private housing from public housing as I think there will be more conditions in selling of public housing once a new value inference method came up.
Reply
#9

There should be a full grant for the first purchase by singkies.
Reply
#10

Well. The right and price are 2 separate matters. And the same matter as well depending on the speaker.
Reply
#11

(18-04-2023, 11:23 AM)Gstalk Wrote:  Right way to go. Male citizens served 2 years of NS, should deserve more recognition for their national service.  
So one way is to provide cheaper housing for those who have served NS. Not for those who just become New citizens

malaysia also

local get local housing discount
foreigner cannot buy local housing resident rate

foreigner must buy 100 times more


greedy singapore pawn poor singaporean
Reply
#12

(18-04-2023, 11:31 AM)Oyk Wrote:  Singaporean chabors do not do NS.  Should they be ENTITLED to cheaper housing if they buy as a single?

They have to endure at least 10 months for each child!
Reply
#13

(18-04-2023, 12:43 PM)grotesqueness Wrote:  malaysia also

local get local housing discount
foreigner cannot buy local housing resident rate

foreigner must buy 100 times more


greedy singapore pawn poor singaporean

In Malaysia, discount is only for Bumiputra!
Reply
#14

(18-04-2023, 12:46 PM)cityhantam Wrote:  In Malaysia, discount is only for Bumiputra!



Ownself discount for ownself

8Umbrella Umbrella
Reply
#15

(18-04-2023, 12:45 PM)cityhantam Wrote:  They have to endure at least 10 months for each child!

Endure 10 months to have a child as a single mother, whose father she herself is not quite sure which.... Rolleyes

Or endure a lifetime as a bergin single, and still be entitled to cheap housing?   Rolleyes
Reply
#16

(18-04-2023, 01:02 PM)Oyk Wrote:  Endure 10 months to have a child as a single mother, whose father she herself is not quite sure which.... Rolleyes

Or endure a lifetime as a bergin single, and still be entitled to cheap housing?   Rolleyes

You mean only single mothers got to endure 10 months?

Those who are not single, the husband can take over pregnancy?  Thinking
Reply
#17

(18-04-2023, 01:04 PM)cityhantam Wrote:  You mean only single mothers got to endure 10 months?

Those who are not single, the husband can take over pregnancy?  Thinking

The husband did 2.5 years NS and____ cycles of reservist.

Singaporean chabors are heading for extinction because they are mostly old spinsters.  Still want cheap housing for what?  Rolleyes
Reply
#18

(18-04-2023, 11:38 AM)Oyk Wrote:  The rich does not need government help anyway.  And more and more Chinese are emigrating to Singapore and buying up private properties.

As for locals, what Jamus Lim is doing is precisely what Lawrence Wong said: dancing to the gallery.  Talk only but no alternative solution offered.

Offer solutions manz.  Not just stand up in Parliament, and say: I want this!  I want that!  

Yeah, doing that will be seen as "speaking up for the man in the street aka oppies".

but they dared to ask n ask sensible questions not some pap mps just echoed what ministers said
that really do not even deserve 1k allownaces not to mention 15k
Who does not know how to do that?

Same for Gerald Giam...asking for a bigger NS allowance for army boys.  That's called "The Oppo MPs are speaking up for the peepur!"  Ranjiao lar.

Curry nah!  Even my grandmother knows how to do that manz.  

You pay the oppo MPs $16K a month just to stand up and ask for this and that?
Reply
#19

The Housing and Development Board is established

[Image: building-works-at-queenstown.ashx?h=auto&w=100%25]

Established on 1 February 1960, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) was formed for the primary functions of managing new and existing buildings, the clearance and redevelopment of slums and urban areas, and the development of rural and agricultural areas for resettlement. These tasks were previously undertaken by the Singapore Improvement Trust (SIT), but the latter was replaced by the HDB due to its poor performance. At the time, the HDB’s most urgent task was to provide low-cost public housing to a growing population, particularly low-income groups who lived in high-risk dilapidated housing structures with overcrowded, unsanitary living conditions. Singapore’s rate of natural increase then was 4.3 percent, that is, about 60,000 citizens added to the population each year.

A major focus of the HDB was to provide affordable housing for low-income families. The government rented out HDB flats at $20 per month (estimated to be no more than 20 percent of the average wage earner’s monthly income) to address this need. Each flat had piped water, electricity, gas, modern sanitation and convenient refuse disposal chutes. Planning not just for isolated blocks of flats, the HDB built housing estates, providing residents with pleasant surroundings and easy access to basic amenities.The low rentals could not cover the cost of construction, hence the government provided the HDB with a housing subsidy.
Reply
#20

@ talky

Grow a rampar, and don't reply inside my post.

If you want to debate with me, do that.  Grow some rampar.   Rolleyes
Reply
#21

(18-04-2023, 01:18 PM)Dan Wrote:  The Housing and Development Board is established

[Image: building-works-at-queenstown.ashx?h=auto&w=100%25]

Established on 1 February 1960, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) was formed for the primary functions of managing new and existing buildings, the clearance and redevelopment of slums and urban areas, and the development of rural and agricultural areas for resettlement. These tasks were previously undertaken by the Singapore Improvement Trust (SIT), but the latter was replaced by the HDB due to its poor performance. At the time, the HDB’s most urgent task was to provide low-cost public housing to a growing population, particularly low-income groups who lived in high-risk dilapidated housing structures with overcrowded, unsanitary living conditions. Singapore’s rate of natural increase then was 4.3 percent, that is, about 60,000 citizens added to the population each year.

A major focus of the HDB was to provide affordable housing for low-income families. The government rented out HDB flats at $20 per month (estimated to be no more than 20 percent of the average wage earner’s monthly income) to address this need. Each flat had piped water, electricity, gas, modern sanitation and convenient refuse disposal chutes. Planning not just for isolated blocks of flats, the HDB built housing estates, providing residents with pleasant surroundings and easy access to basic amenities.The low rentals could not cover the cost of construction, hence the government provided the HDB with a housing subsidy.

Did they deviated from the original intentions and gone profit orientated like NTUC?

Laughing Laughing
Reply
#22

Only Foreigners like Jac LAU reject such an idea

because they are ROBBERS and want to enjoy our BirthRight

to being racist,

to have our own housing as priority

and not to be deprived of a job we can do

Why do we need 5 Mayors and 80 PAP Ministers? 
Reply
#23

(18-04-2023, 11:31 AM)Oyk Wrote:  Singaporean chabors do not do NS.  Should they be ENTITLED to cheaper housing if they buy as a single?
Reply
#24

KNN a 4-room flat typically costs $605K, how are Sinkies ever going to have sufficient funds to retire?

https://www.bannedsite.com/forum/current...-to-retire
Reply
#25

(18-04-2023, 06:41 PM)Ola Wrote:  Only Foreigners like Jac LAU reject such an idea

because they are ROBBERS and want to enjoy our BirthRight

to being racist,

to have our own housing as priority

and not to be deprived of a job we can do

Citizens who have served fulltime NS, should have housing priority........and also not to deprive them of a decent job............... Big Grin
Reply
#26

Serving two years NSF, a man has no annual bonus, CPF, PB and other benefits
He is paid NS allowance 
Do you think those who served and completed  NSF  should be given housing allowance/subsidy?
Reply
#27

(18-04-2023, 09:42 PM)Oasis Wrote:  Serving two years NSF, a man has no annual bonus, CPF, PB and other benefits
He is paid NS allowance 
Do you think those who served and completed  NSF  should be given housing allowance/subsidy?

That is something the MIW can look at............... Big Grin
Reply
#28

Right without teeth
You cannot produce the right sperms for the right eggs
while Dinaosaurs' eggs are hatching at ICC Kallang
You will die off
Reply
#29

sg is not a place we called home. just a big company . sad for our founding father and pioneer who slowly built up sg. in the end , foreigner take over.
Reply
#30

Says a lot about SG and the PAP government/elites of today, when something like what Jamus said can come off as sounding so revolutionary and radical. 

[Image: sgmatters.com-i-could-not-ask-their-sons...an-yew.png]

And now guess what? SG is turning into Tokyo, Seoul, and HK. Except not in a good way.

SEE ONE WUMAO, KILL ONE WUMAO!!! 
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)