Netizens dispute ‘voluntary’ claim over Bukit Canberra hawkers’ binding
#1

Netizens dispute ‘voluntary’ claim over Bukit Canberra hawkers’ binding free meals clause 

Despite Minister Ong Ye Kung and operator Canopy Hawkers Group’s defence, legal experts say Bukit Canberra hawkers are contractually bound to provide free meals. Netizens criticised “double talk” over claims of voluntariness, arguing the charity burden should not fall on stallholders already facing financial strain.

https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2025/08...ls-clause/
Reply
#2

need some advice who ish SURE notch happy about this lololololol... Tongue

“Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth” – Buddha.
[Image: https://i.ibb.co/0hWSqby/wednesday-quote.jpg]
Reply
#3

Not right to include those terms in the contract, and aso not right to disagree after signing the contract. So both parties are in the wrong. So what's the problem now?
Reply
#4

Hawkers need a job and forced to sign the Contract

The problem is the Hawker Operator Tee Tree Investments

making temp cupboard storage into permanent charges

and reminding the hawkers, lor

https://teetreeinvestments.com/our-brands/

Sack half the Mayors & PAP Ministers
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)